From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Bavier Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: boost: Update to 1.61.0. Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 12:14:09 -0500 Message-ID: References: <8737kw2tp8.fsf@gnu.org> <871t0g2o7m.fsf@gnu.org> <79cd9857b728801cd6721dcd8c15882e@openmailbox.org> <87vaxrhr85.fsf@gnu.org> <20160920155818.52acdeeb@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35163) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bn7Zp-0005KR-8V for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:14:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bn7Zm-0007fL-1n for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:14:25 -0400 Received: from smtp12.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.46]:60933) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bn7Zl-0007bV-Rg for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:14:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160920155818.52acdeeb@openmailbox.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Roel Janssen Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Guix-devel On 2016-09-20 15:58, Eric Bavier wrote: > On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 11:10:02 +0200 > Roel Janssen wrote: > >> Is there anything that requires more work to apply your patch for >> MySQL >> and then upgrade Boost? Are there any other packages that break that >> we >> should look into? > > As far as I recall, the only breakages besides mysql that I experienced > were due to reasons outside of the boost upgrade. I'll try to find my > notes from those builds... > > Given that this upgrade forces a rebuild of libreoffice, should it be > applied to core-updates? For my own sanity, I rebased this patch onto master and tried building libreoffice, which succeeded. I'll push this patch when I have my signing key available. -- `~Eric