From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arun Isaac Subject: Re: Mumi now uses raw emails and Mu Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 00:16:22 +0530 Message-ID: References: <87ef2jdtuc.fsf@elephly.net> <87blxme6pk.fsf@elephly.net> <875zntc8ux.fsf@elephly.net> <87blxjba33.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48700) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqMHp-0001uP-1u for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:46:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hqMHo-0006oo-1r for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:46:49 -0400 Received: from mugam.systemreboot.net ([139.59.75.54]:52100) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hqMHm-0006nV-Vb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:46:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87blxjba33.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >> Can't we find the bug number of an email by matching the To and Cc >> addresses against xxxxx@debbugs.gnu.org where xxxxx is a bug number? > > No because the initial email would be sent to bug-guix@gnu.org or > guix-patches@gnu.org, not xxxxx@debbugs.gnu.org. Yeah, right, I forgot about the first email. > There are also some control messages which are not sent to > xxxxx@debbugs.gnu.org but are received by the Debbugs service through > other means. > > I=E2=80=99m now getting the bug number by convention: mumi gets them from > Debbugs, stores them in a predictable fashion ( dash ), > and mumimu gets the bug number from that file name. Ok, that makes sense. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEf3MDQ/Lwnzx3v3nTLiXui2GAK7MFAl04p38ACgkQLiXui2GA K7PEuggAocolNMERUt2WJJDHCzpPg/SXNBEQWcKJs5Y7XVzFbVq2gxVWdis9VjnS Bxxk9cK8V27Kd8KIWWscTDMxKEzC2PukZYt4I0ONSoQphBJJhD0fWsYW3AcQ+4AD iAKvztNt7pBLQs1HHtalY6MzWMEZb6O7ITUaTFmgWM7EIFZXSrkMxOxYweugiV9s 7FKuGhVwSL0GQeyuAsMRmQVQUsYzYdWsmmmG0h7Dz//tOwobLtyPzpqxGnf1rAmn g6n5JDa89CTf9RFIkIchsXv2vK0RP5DDp2PYBnwYOJfPd1nE1fKS8T1DgbVtcp7M IJkZtvgaSrkhTvNGvqNXZtKDf3QCHQ== =R3my -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--