From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net>
Subject: Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 03:11:02 +0530
Message-ID: <cu7r23kwa6p.fsf@systemreboot.net>
References: <87ftk4hbhu.fsf@gnu.org> <87wodfi44x.fsf@gmail.com>
 <87y2xui9fr.fsf@igalia.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59484)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <arunisaac@systemreboot.net>) id 1iIgBY-0007Bp-2j
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 17:41:25 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <arunisaac@systemreboot.net>) id 1iIgBW-0005UG-5y
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 17:41:23 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87y2xui9fr.fsf@igalia.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Andy Wingo <wingo@igalia.com>, Dimakakos Dimos <bendersteed@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, GNU Guix maintainers <guix-maintainers@gnu.org>

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain


> For what it is worth, I have some personal answers to some of these
> questions here:
>
>   https://wingolog.org/archives/2019/10/08/thoughts-on-rms-and-gnu

I largely agree with the thoughts you have expressed in this blog
post. I think the original joint statement on the Guix blog should
articulate these ideas in a similar way. The way the statement stands
right now, it is too vague and open to misinterpretation.

Regards,
Arun.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEf3MDQ/Lwnzx3v3nTLiXui2GAK7MFAl2fpW4ACgkQLiXui2GA
K7OTKgf+PxqXSXYUgzOL7f4L3cnomzqZ0ktDmUD7EULXXImBk2v3G8uPvl/2AcIT
dkUO/sOJtwuLtihHOQLnKz55UD2d8vaCXiAqLR7dC4jGDAN+/hmDNWkZeI5UBw4k
g6X3rHjJ/mRJk/OK/X+YK4KQtNq/NUZ4ATgB9Sd/Z59Q+N6Pfiz6WB3XayHbJzGh
99PFhE68aM1UufWSFy/SvPM3oVaoKlOwXTBfwm3I2yQZani4RQ/R7QMlp3mpvb/r
1a6KX83sxxTlAFdaQur6ItEaJ/zX24UUp5E6vMPz46uuSKxIRdSAH2q0AEggCbXY
h36KDWLLFOOM/5/O8aT/nHydZN424A==
=Qe4T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--