From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arun Isaac Subject: Re: Why should build phases not return unspecified values? Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 15:57:58 +0530 Message-ID: References: <8737462yft.fsf@netris.org> <87609121hn.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60401) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRbbv-0000TO-Fe for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 05:28:28 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRbbs-0006Af-NE for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 05:28:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87609121hn.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 29745@debbugs.gnu.org > Concretely, we can: > > 1. Encourage use of =E2=80=98invoke=E2=80=99 when reviewing or writing = new package > definitions; > > 2. Gradually migrate packages (we can do a bit of that in > =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99, though we won=E2=80=99t do full rebu= ilds at this stage). > > How does that sound? Sounds good. I agree to all the above.