From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: [PATCH 0/1] Another Let's Encrypt client Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 10:49:37 -0400 Message-ID: Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59949) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfpn5-0005Fw-4D for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 10:50:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfpmy-0003p9-QI for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 10:49:58 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:59320) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfpmx-0003nx-Gm for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 10:49:52 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-73-188-17-148.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.188.17.148]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B9D57F29CC for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 10:49:42 -0400 (EDT) List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org I have been looking at this Let's Encrypt client for a little while. It was just merged into the OpenBSD base system, and had its name changed from 'letskencrypt' to the generic 'acme-client'. The name might be too generic; I found at least 4 different programs with this name. https://kristaps.bsd.lv/acme-client/ Some attempt has been made to reduce the risks inherent to running the program as root, as described on the home page. And, I did a minimal test: I was able to get a new certificate. Leo Famulari (1): gnu: Add acme-client. gnu/packages/tls.scm | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+) -- 2.9.3