From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: [PATCH 0/1] Don't bootstrap ncmpcpp? Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 19:29:19 -0400 Message-ID: Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33563) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1auTT2-0000XR-UQ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 19:29:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1auTT0-0007Lw-08 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 19:29:32 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:35489) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1auTSy-0007LP-Qr for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 19:29:29 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-73-233-160-251.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.233.160.251]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 53A68C00014 for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 19:29:26 -0400 (EDT) List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org I wondered why we re-bootstrap ncmpcpp, so I tried to build without doing it. It works fine for me. Does anyone know why we started doing it? The mailing list thread where the patch was submitted doesn't address it [0]. I've attached a patch to stop doing it and remove the unused inputs. I'm not sure how to word the commit message. [0] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-02/msg00864.html Leo Famulari (1): gnu: ncmpcpp: Remove bootstrapping inputs. gnu/packages/mpd.scm | 14 ++------------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) -- 2.7.4