From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: [PATCH 0/1] Show to use vm-image Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 05:12:23 -0500 Message-ID: Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35659) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aK1Mm-000513-7z for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 05:12:24 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aK1Mi-00010i-Sa for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 05:12:24 -0500 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:53370) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aK1Mi-00010d-PL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 05:12:20 -0500 Received: from jasmine.lan (c-69-249-5-231.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [69.249.5.231]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1EF7E68017D for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 05:12:18 -0500 (EST) List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org This patch on the manual explains how to use the output of `guix system vm-image`. Thoughts? It seems wrong to repeat the command-line like that, but I don't know a better way to explain the elements of the command. On the other hand, the annotated version is hard to read as a command-line. Should it change somehow, or is it fine? I tried booting i686 on x86_64 and it didn't work, so I didn't mention the possibility. Leo Famulari (1): doc: Show how to boot result of 'vm-image'. doc/guix.texi | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- 2.6.4