From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hartmut Goebel Subject: Re: PYTHONPATH issue analysis - part 3 Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:04:21 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87371tqbyb.fsf@elephly.net> <20180223165953.GA6088@thebird.nl> <871sgn1xhf.fsf@gnu.org> <20180313214431.GA15654@thebird.nl> <3713e2d0-600f-d624-03b6-19096643c876@crazy-compilers.com> <20180314074941.GA18245@thebird.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52218) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ew2Kk-0007pc-Th for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 05:04:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ew2Kg-0005mz-W6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 05:04:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20180314074941.GA18245@thebird.nl> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Pjotr Prins Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi Pjotr, no offense meant, but I have the impression you did not read my analysis and proposals, did you? > I propose we patch the interpreter to tell about the Guix paths. It > probably only needs to be done in one place. They should go after the > PYTHONPATH as it is done by Python itself, like you suggested earlier. See option 3 of my analysis part 3. -- Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel | h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com | | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |