From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4789::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id iPc5Bfx7C2WAOgEAauVa8A:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 01:10:52 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4789::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id iPc5Bfx7C2WAOgEAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 01:10:52 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D871C5BBF5 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 01:10:51 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1695251452; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=CbnfC2Zl51bpDDIV7wJfQlW2/8hFSWEcZgbHhx4GrLw=; b=pTxa5Pm3Xb2SAvSL0JvIlQUCb47Hj5UB6/iwkHZDiEaOKUIwGMit4LYHHKm5oSNAc8AT1Q 2xY+Jv8j2a4wb2heyXkVxlVe96CoHK0tVbEK5R4qBYr5168TCN4V+ZJKaYPXd2rBbg9qIz ns8mc5gBibHUEvNittbYoJ6vyacgKn0KypiyDqW95IeE80pwf1HtLx0FMOrS1I0FstTzW7 EzlSKTMhzDbNAg0sGBbYav2BhJxtpBRe+WSKoATs3lu9vcyroJDAroRwkeLwBzSOcOxSIE TI97QYezlANLxr3fqRQoT/7abi1lszAzVH2eh6y7RrzKgCIl/Gt+2OcRvVXJ4g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1695251452; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=cloSlnj38SdYKiBx2qytCxmhgp6bzVcyFuiVWz5xvn1/cXVnlMpHUX2nuIXC2g8vw4F+57 7PA1cWbJx7vBMkewFOdGP6dLr2eWE7ZVLitCW6/b4xGTDk/fEa00L2ty/eK7nNF657OFKo 06/N7egwYwg8XBvHzr1VCw35TzzVjo1pTBFUiHSQTeRS+GWKukZlBcNC81QA0tcQ5BAQH2 6GM3KW+R7VuBSQHY4jqa8oxntN4c89iOY8/CsDW6eKzvJpOrpBOkscSt8+iR52s9BP55uL SFpMEbEC9cUIMDWOEAYq2PW57lSpY3rDxIhb+cilYJWjcCI/xfF1RNDfU3VwcA== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qj6Kk-0003l1-2b; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 19:10:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qj6Ki-0003km-M2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 19:10:12 -0400 Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qj6Kh-0002wA-9l for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 19:10:12 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qj6Ke-0003Fj-2C for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 01:10:08 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: guix-devel@gnu.org From: Katherine Cox-Buday Subject: Re: OCI-backed Guix System Services Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 17:10:02 -0600 Message-ID: References: <07894441-fd4b-a299-d138-5da88c2c42ab@autistici.org> <87sf788p9w.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0 Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <87sf788p9w.fsf@elephly.net> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=gcggd-guix-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -9 X-Spam_score: -1.0 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.473, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Scanner: mx1.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.91 X-Spam-Score: -2.91 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: D871C5BBF5 X-TUID: MmxQXP/TAVtR On 9/20/23 4:12 PM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> To conclude, I'm not advocating for adding OCI-backed services to Guix mainstream: in my opinion they should be bootstrapped and >> built from source, but I believe the actual "backend" implementation for such services could be useful to have in Guix. What do you >> think? > > I think this could still be a valuable addition to Guix, because it > integrates with Shepherd and thus unifies management of system services > independent of whether they came from Guix or from elsewhere. I completely agree. It would be so nice to have a unified interface to manage everything!