From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rchar01 Subject: Re: Roadmap for Guix 1.0 Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2018 07:36:35 +0000 Message-ID: References: <878t5udq9u.fsf@gnu.org> <875zzsdqm2.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87wos8xdqm.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1o89flh.fsf@elephly.net> <87a7p3zmzu.fsf@gmail.com> <877ek6lijk.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: rchar01 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45319) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fw0gr-0006Jp-RG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2018 03:51:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fw0Sj-0003QW-9v for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2018 03:36:56 -0400 Received: from mail-40136.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.136]:44053) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fw0Si-0003PU-VI for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2018 03:36:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: "guix-devel@gnu.org" Cc: "myglc2@gmail.com" As an example, PureOS had a similar idea for the name. - https://www.pureos.net/ - from https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.en.html Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Me= ssage =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 On August 31, 2018 5:54 PM, Amirouche Boubekki wrote: > > > > If we want an > > > > improved label for the Guix system distribution, the best one is > > > > probably "GuixOS" since "OS" is a widely used and recognized > > > > abbreviation ... > > > > Is exactly my opinion also, so it gets a +1 > > Top 3: > > 1. GuixOS > 2. Guix > 3. Guix System