From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id IAJqKOW5smAbbgEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 00:02:13 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id kM3nI+W5smB5MAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 22:02:13 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9D9A1FB59 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 00:02:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:48504 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ln723-0001wT-Dx for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 29 May 2021 18:02:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36022) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ln71u-0001tM-21 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2021 18:02:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46319) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ln71t-00047z-Oi for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2021 18:02:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ln71t-0004kN-KI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2021 18:02:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#47768] ocaml - how can we get more recent version of core-kernel and common ppx'es Resent-From: Erik Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 22:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47768 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: pukkamustard Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 47768@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 47768-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47768.162232569118208 (code B ref 47768); Sat, 29 May 2021 22:02:01 +0000 Received: (at 47768) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 May 2021 22:01:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57865 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ln71P-0004jc-2N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2021 18:01:31 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:50883) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ln71K-0004jM-W1 for 47768@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2021 18:01:29 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9953240101 for <47768@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 30 May 2021 00:01:20 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1622325680; bh=Ej6o17MTeX6NTC89dTq3RbVOaIKGhYoBk3tRcnkh0Vg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From; b=IpoMll9jzQ0hz5UoW6jxardBj6W09OfjaVhhXVGmFFPSbXUStSXHAnGONwEsA/kl7 ya89bAV1n212Dj5Fyz0O4kbueQxYhoAI7KVYJ/8msSrEXBfQXymP0pilGkhwDIKQVo qQD9iM1+35hEQ4xc/sD0H6QBInn3trfIvO6pc50Bk8hsy0BL0BgCY0yiDech67iKAK 16/45vvgSIEH1/Z65AXQRjsOKxoFIBYhp4WtjY5fi/weyoM+c/bMlSo3wh6tgxExjK /sWF4errItl1pHlwnaC+6ZmAGVGI937RDssaUvqbpBXlqCQpH2RhTZfUnb7bGxeiVw 1Nn64/vPOzkDg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4FswVl3dkMz6tmN; Sun, 30 May 2021 00:01:19 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 22:01:19 +0000 From: Erik In-Reply-To: <86h7iz7p6f.fsf@posteo.net> References: <86h7iz7p6f.fsf@posteo.net> Message-ID: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1622325733; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=Ej6o17MTeX6NTC89dTq3RbVOaIKGhYoBk3tRcnkh0Vg=; b=EhrRLmf/H98Cblgqc/Cipn3imv7JCcc2/0kSUXdUeytndhyVKDSE+r4Pr7V157RdFM4aS0 E/S8wbHNYbIQ6ZnIlNyO59rJqSjwdTdYQjpf3qN5Vmg7sxEz5UZ6QZZWnNDeEdC4//YO04 Fy09nQkM91M8g3hWYzJdIOIpZq19LKBx7SoKr7d0mg/Of1cZJlSE0ZVQJqODddnMlQ6nIA Vc/2PLCR62iuTj6B3Un503dHa2J6jICIV5iB+r8Dg6JY2cYCObr5GlM8ovrPIQ8SsPhMRN tXtKaZePvKdvkYrl8MTWIAUtBNsERE7Rg3vrzVXbRkHMXStvYoItBD+JOWEgag== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1622325733; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=jyErgx3A9arW9/ZLdNUkAUqAa0sHmCfv8ANQjDpKCCpR7AZ55oYU4RTXtl9kW1VBSxTaWS kKIziQ37YDE4TG3ufC5cZxq8uZ66NIEuk/rRFR6XTdxAUd+BEjO0/kMSDqBudMofhjysT2 3vMR20G+sPbxJI89Tf5KiOTZ8nvKNuXCEWYYBPotkCH5UohWstqYZSlvZoYxldHdz6v+Y6 ecJmWLgclFmwoPsKQP1D7OKtUjPZ7eO7pn3RJOBbj56wLgustmCG+PfnneO4Sd7vxJsrLr iNo8ompMt8JDTOJfEh15irQ5IL9E1HeRLfUId1x423TTGayO2VEzSR1XE6t9sw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=IpoMll9j; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.33 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=IpoMll9j; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: B9D9A1FB59 X-Spam-Score: -1.33 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: Mt2D1giy5rg3 I have now applied the patches locally and tested a handful of the=20 updated packages, and things appear to be working fine for me. Thanks a=20 lot for doing this! What is the process for getting these patches commited to master? Do we=20 need someone to test that the patches didn't break any existing package? /Erik=C2=A0 On 18.05.2021 22:29, pukkamustard wrote: > Hi Erik, >=20 > There has been some work towards updating the OCaml packages in Guix > (see https://issues.guix.gnu.org/47768). >=20 > A lot of packages have been updated so that there is a now an updated > ocaml-X package for a previously existing ocaml4.07-X package. This > includes a lot of ppx'es. However not everything has been updated yet > and there are still a few packages missing to be able to update > ocaml-core-kernel. But maybe you could use the #47768 as a basis and > update some packages towards ocaml-core-kernel? >=20 > Help is also required in reviewing the patches. The series has become > quite large and hard to review (42 patches). If you could try them out > that would be great. >=20 > -pukkamustard >=20 >=20 > Erik writes: >=20 >> Hi, I have a project that requires a more recent core-kernel and some=20 >> of the >> ppx'es (such as ppx_fields_conv). >>=20 >> Being very new to guix I've managed to add/update packages for python=20 >> and ruby >> stuff, but this ocaml.scm file is quite different. There's a lot going= =20 >> on which >> I'm guessing is related to complexities arising from the whole ppx=20 >> transition >> that happened in the ocaml ecosystem a few years ago, or perhaps just=20 >> to the >> somewhat unsynchronized way libraries move to new versions of the=20 >> compiler and >> libs (just speculating here). >>=20 >> Anyway afaict (with my limited guix-fu) I would either need to=20 >> duplicate a whole >> lot of packages or somehow reorganize things to share definitions=20 >> where it makes >> sense. Both those options would require some coordination with the=20 >> people who >> made the ocaml.scm infrastructure first, because clearly there are=20 >> projects out >> there that need the current set of packages to work like they do now=20 >> and I don't >> want to just post a huge patch that surprises these people. >>=20 >> Can we get a thread going somewhere on adding a recent version of >> ocaml-core-kernel (for the 4.11.1 ocaml package, possibly bumping that= =20 >> to 4.11.2 in the process)? >>=20 >> Best regards, >> Erik Lovlie