unofficial mirror of guix-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jack Hill <jackhill@jackhill.us>
To: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Jam: which licence is this?
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 16:53:11 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2104251642060.8414@marsh.hcoop.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875z0anmf7.fsf@yucca>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2924 bytes --]

On Sun, 25 Apr 2021, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:

> On 2021-04-25, Jack Hill wrote:
>> I'm working on packaging the Argyll Color Management System for Guix. To
>> build, it uses the Jam tool, which has the following license:
>>
>> ```
>> This is Release 2.5 of Jam, a make-like program.
>>
>> License is hereby granted to use this software and distribute it
>> freely, as long as this copyright notice is retained and modifications
>> are clearly marked.
>>
>> ALL WARRANTIES ARE HEREBY DISCLAIMED.
>> ```
>
> Permission to use, check.
> Permission to study, probably(?)
> Permission to share, check.
> Permission to modify, .... ?
>
> Is it even free software? There is no mention of modification which
> doesn't appear to be free by my layman's reading...

I do see a mention of modification "…modifications are clearly marked." 
Compare with the gnuplot license, for which modifications can only be 
distributed as separate patch files

/*[
  * Copyright 1986 - 1993, 1998, 2004   Thomas Williams, Colin Kelley
  *
  * Permission to use, copy, and distribute this software and its
  * documentation for any purpose with or without fee is hereby granted,
  * provided that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and
  * that both that copyright notice and this permission notice appear
  * in supporting documentation.
  *
  * Permission to modify the software is granted, but not the right to
  * distribute the complete modified source code.  Modifications are to
  * be distributed as patches to the released version.  Permission to
  * distribute binaries produced by compiling modified sources is granted,
  * provided you
  *   1. distribute the corresponding source modifications from the
  *    released version in the form of a patch file along with the binaries,
  *   2. add special version identification to distinguish your version
  *    in addition to the base release version number,
  *   3. provide your name and address as the primary contact for the
  *    support of your modified version, and
  *   4. retain our contact information in regard to use of the base
  *    software.
  * Permission to distribute the released version of the source code along
  * with corresponding source modifications in the form of a patch file is
  * granted with same provisions 2 through 4 for binary distributions.
  *
  * This software is provided "as is" without express or implied warranty
  * to the extent permitted by applicable law.
]*/

ajam clearly marks its modifications by including this in its readme:

"""
This if "Argyll-Jam", a simple derivative of the "FT-Jam" build tool, based and
100% compatible with Jam 2.5. See http://www.freetype.org/jam/ for more
details about FT-Jam.

This is the "FT-Jam" 2.5.2 release, with minor ArgyllCMS tweaks,
and the ArgyllCMS V1.3.3 Jambase as the default rule set.

Note that you'll find the original Jam README in the file README.ORG
"""

Thoughts?
Jack

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-25 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-25  6:15 Jam: which licence is this? Jack Hill
2021-04-25  7:16 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2021-04-25 17:25   ` Mark H Weaver
2021-04-25 17:35     ` Leo Famulari
2021-04-25 20:37       ` Mark H Weaver
2021-04-26 16:24         ` Leo Famulari
2021-05-02  4:53           ` Mark H Weaver
2021-05-02 15:20             ` Leo Famulari
2021-05-07 18:31               ` The purpose of the "license" list of a Guix package (Was: Re: Jam: which licence is this?) Chris Marusich
2021-05-07 19:23                 ` The purpose of the "license" list of a Guix package Chris Marusich
2021-05-08 10:16                 ` The purpose of the "license" list of a Guix package (Was: Re: Jam: which licence is this?) Leo Prikler
2021-05-08 11:17                   ` Ricardo Wurmus
2021-05-08 11:22                     ` Leo Prikler
2021-05-08 20:52                   ` Maxime Devos
2021-05-08 23:04                     ` Leo Prikler
2021-05-09  8:33                       ` Maxime Devos
2021-05-02 21:12             ` Jam: which licence is this? Ludovic Courtès
2021-04-25 17:42 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-04-28 13:20   ` Maxim Cournoyer
2021-04-25 20:23 ` Vagrant Cascadian
2021-04-25 20:49   ` Ricardo Wurmus
2021-04-25 20:53   ` Jack Hill [this message]
2021-04-25 21:04     ` Jack Hill
2021-04-26 14:36       ` Jack Hill
2021-05-02  5:02         ` Mark H Weaver
2021-04-25 21:41     ` Vagrant Cascadian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.2104251642060.8414@marsh.hcoop.net \
    --to=jackhill@jackhill.us \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=vagrant@debian.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).