From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 2KhsEqJ+JF/zJQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 20:27:14 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id uAspDqJ+JF+yFwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 20:27:14 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD7C9940223 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 20:27:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54032 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k1bcW-0000Rs-Ot for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 16:27:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53774) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k1bcM-0000Rj-IW for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 16:27:02 -0400 Received: from minsky.hcoop.net ([104.248.1.95]:45944) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k1bcK-0003iR-PQ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 16:27:02 -0400 Received: from marsh.hcoop.net ([45.55.52.66]) by minsky.hcoop.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1k1bcJ-0003o7-9b for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 16:26:59 -0400 Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 16:26:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Jack Hill X-X-Sender: jackhill@marsh.hcoop.net To: guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: neovim and luajit? Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Received-SPF: pass client-ip=104.248.1.95; envelope-from=jackhill@jackhill.us; helo=minsky.hcoop.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/07/31 16:26:59 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.49 X-TUID: cLNGvF3hwXAV Hi Guix, I'm wondering why we use Lua 5.1 instead of LuaJIT for neovim? It seems that upstream prefers LuaJIT given the non-default configure flag we use[0] and their FAQ[1]. I don't have an opinion either way. I'm learning about neovim today, and am curious how we arrived at our configuration. [0] https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/vim.scm?id=96a655a77bb087397a9436391e472c36ff0a2ec2#n647 [1] https://github.com/neovim/neovim/wiki/FAQ#why-embed-lua-instead-of-x Best, Jack