From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id swPRH9tWImBxQwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 09:33:15 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id yJMzG9tWImCpKgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 09:33:15 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF5649403D2 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 09:33:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:56382 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9POT-0007Mn-OT for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 04:33:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43698) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9PO5-0007MM-Vo for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 04:32:50 -0500 Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at ([129.27.2.202]:30357) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9PO3-0004vD-En for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 04:32:49 -0500 Received: from nijino.local (217-149-165-242.nat.highway.telekom.at [217.149.165.242]) by mailrelay.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DZd3C02nxz1LZW9; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 10:32:38 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailrelay.tugraz.at 4DZd3C02nxz1LZW9 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tugraz.at; s=mailrelay; t=1612863159; bh=7j717+0lrmcLzhXhp+0h8nJicpe/xhce23pyumElcdA=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=ti8P8rvfhBcQEjYAFpHLVzVMVxFJsoaNtNcH13sf2nJJuu0AJLIRCr5Trvz15t2O7 urQcGG3GTsrcWwg6cCv6PbtG1E8xz75IzVPq/4as2iV5rK7LdbVVb8OsS4r48SNj/3 lyGfgREBZctpFWPWitGznMdlJ1qP/Kos9PsJ8prY= Message-ID: Subject: [DOUBT]: native-search-paths VS search-paths From: Leo Prikler To: rg@raghavgururajan.name Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 10:32:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: fb1ec515-8f57-9a1b-3755-79f208d3da13@raghavgururajan.name Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUG-Backscatter-control: bt4lQm5Tva3SBgCuw0EnZw X-Spam-Scanner: SpamAssassin 3.003001 X-Spam-Score-relay: -1.9 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 129.27.10.116 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=129.27.2.202; envelope-from=leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at; helo=mailrelay.tugraz.at X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.06 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=tugraz.at header.s=mailrelay header.b=ti8P8rvf; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=student.tugraz.at; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: CF5649403D2 X-Spam-Score: -3.06 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: MRnMtG6qGRtW Hello, Both search-paths and native-search-paths are expanded in a build environment to form an environment variable. search-paths works on inputs whereas native-search-paths works on native-inputs. In addition, native-search-paths also end up in your $GUIX_PROFILE/etc/profile. Regards, Leo