From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] gnu: Add sshuttle. Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 17:26:40 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20161207032000.8120-1-me@tobias.gr> <91b2d294-8b8e-e004-e2b9-6692d062b8a1@crazy-compilers.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OpFSeIJMf8vFu5Bk9OIvQUGbtPcMQk3i5" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53959) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEf3Y-0004eH-D8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 11:26:57 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEf3V-00045g-7P for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 11:26:56 -0500 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::197]:59573) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEf3V-00045S-12 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 11:26:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: <91b2d294-8b8e-e004-e2b9-6692d062b8a1@crazy-compilers.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com, guix-devel@gnu.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --OpFSeIJMf8vFu5Bk9OIvQUGbtPcMQk3i5 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="DicaufkFsrnjKnAOVJMM6JWpuDbvpK0h6"; protected-headers="v1" From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com, guix-devel@gnu.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] gnu: Add sshuttle. References: <20161207032000.8120-1-me@tobias.gr> <91b2d294-8b8e-e004-e2b9-6692d062b8a1@crazy-compilers.com> In-Reply-To: <91b2d294-8b8e-e004-e2b9-6692d062b8a1@crazy-compilers.com> --DicaufkFsrnjKnAOVJMM6JWpuDbvpK0h6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hartmut, On 07/12/16 10:44, Hartmut Goebel wrote: > The LICENCE file says LGPL 2.1+ as you said, but > https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sshuttle/ says it is GPL2+. I know :-) That would be because of this gem, copied from... head -n 5 setup.py #!/usr/bin/env python # Copyright 2012-2014 Brian May # # This file is part of python-tldap. Which appears never to have been updated. > Can you please verify which one is correct. I have as much information as you... I've filed a bug report, with the suggested fix to add LGPL2+ licence headers to the source files to remove any confusion. Since the last commit was in March, and considering there is a LICENSE file present, I propose we add the package as LGPL2 (conservatively, license:lgpl2.0) until further notice. Kind regards, T G-R --DicaufkFsrnjKnAOVJMM6JWpuDbvpK0h6-- --OpFSeIJMf8vFu5Bk9OIvQUGbtPcMQk3i5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEqBAEBCgAUBQJYSDhADRxtZUB0b2JpYXMuZ3IACgkQkczbm0hUG5lUPAgAmwtH 7jz/xL4McDkOSa+3deW1W6+tyukATbRivlDe0CUOxMoi9ZfPL6gdPJQLw4qK9+UI vW+3wI9t0OqY8gRGKMRaTiEBVlaCPHXoLyQmqYu/yMvFlI6/uVZtvFBR6ehn1+LD aOUhNKA3JeAqKpNKG1VV/kxJi3fw7jGINeP9XeGIfRfKuG0dQpSsinLmpBnAoU48 wLShSBxfOLQ298BorCs/URy21PyYWi3tq629Ft+eS959o23DifBEOjT5oMP0cYUG RmINT1swZFYsojqdT5TC98FpLpL9OCu5VsIv1BrXJWe95YXo5sQ+ckkz+zVGvmJv lnWFG+5Ibyss3d87Ag== =YQtw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OpFSeIJMf8vFu5Bk9OIvQUGbtPcMQk3i5--