From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id EBAWOCL8iV8vcAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 20:01:38 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id kHT+MyL8iV8WVQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 20:01:38 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57C949400C7 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 20:01:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:50360 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kTVuz-0006uh-B2 for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 16:01:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45440) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kTVuM-0006uJ-9V for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 16:00:58 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:20411) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kTVuI-0004d0-Qy; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 16:00:57 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id d17e02fc; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 22:00:50 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h= mime-version:date:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from :message-id:subject:to:cc:in-reply-to:references; s=20190914; bh=IPdPJvDdzCH3XyruiadK/M6/SI87W1Fa8E3ATmD0Dzg=; b=KRoZcwWb97Iq xR5tI+kuerSXUJXvLjamxA7LeLQCEpcS5a5qyFqPmmoJcKyKmS5pCCQt9PMPLw8y hOurxHkJFU2mA5nNTCo8MaQgt69nWr1WFBkgpXzLTBy9BI98YiY8qYmIoMzSHx2d K93clEoYav5WlEY4/C77bAeXLgWHB0Y+XEe+VX+UoB2g73KGfNU027oWikUWU6rt hKk7U/9XZjAWbpkJ66pFcuSEZ8gNIgO+mrmKvIjtfGx+nYE0QQEVZ184t3Inhp/E okaAwYHdn1VdARiteORgONKBXT0w1ak3SgaEudjKXnUX7Pf8InUrqVreX8CjNvs3 x7mizGcz+A== Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id c36c0c87; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 22:00:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 7d067bd2; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 22:00:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 76035f2c (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 16 Oct 2020 22:00:49 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 20:00:48 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: RainLoop/1.14.0a From: jbranso@dismail.de Message-ID: Subject: =?utf-8?B?UmU6IFJlbW92aW5nL3JlcGxhY2luZyDigJxHdWl4IGluIGE=?= =?utf-8?B?Y3Rpb27igJ0gdmlkZW8gZnJvbSB0aGUgaG9tZSBwYWdlPw==?= To: "Luis Felipe" , "zimoun" Cc: "=?utf-8?B?THVkb3ZpYyBDb3VydMOocw==?=" , "guix-devel" In-Reply-To: <4JD1z15e92ccv6WXcMS5IiNJnDwR6P3bkIwtPWLUPYDVCUHYDoekpifyj3GQtnEq1LCKftbL-FV1hp162A1mid2EmjLMbWlxQ05aE9vGyf0=@protonmail.com> References: <4JD1z15e92ccv6WXcMS5IiNJnDwR6P3bkIwtPWLUPYDVCUHYDoekpifyj3GQtnEq1LCKftbL-FV1hp162A1mid2EmjLMbWlxQ05aE9vGyf0=@protonmail.com> <87o8l7pple.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7qxhncq.fsf@gnu.org> <3aQjRn5jGhxHrhAmuB3MfLRjSxAp3PVFu1vL7_GV1ucGibzYURCtMqHN4oeyGb5xez2xYM3loEJIECrVdnAGZBZvf0N1bGXN-80mO6Ymr6k=@protonmail.com> <87sgagv8qt.fsf@dismail.de> <87o8l279eb.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=78.46.223.134; envelope-from=jbranso@dismail.de; helo=mx1.dismail.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/16 15:57:55 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = ??? X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=KRoZcwWb; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=dismail.de; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.71 X-TUID: /Kl+ficuQC5a I do share Luis' sentiments that perhaps the video should mention that th= e =0Ainstall commands may take some time to complete, but in the interest= of brevity,=0Awe can always cut those bits out of the video.=0A=0ADo you= know what that means!? I get to learn video editing! SILLY SALTY =0ASA= LAMANDERS THAT'S AWESOME! :)=0A=0ADo ya'll have any video editors that y= ou'd recommend?=0A=0AOctober 16, 2020 11:27 AM, "Luis Felipe" wrote:=0A=0A> =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90= =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Message =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90= =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=0A> On Friday, October 16, 2020 10:3= 6 AM, zimoun wrote:=0A> =0A>> Hi,=0A>> =0A>> O= n Fri, 16 Oct 2020 at 12:28, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s ludo@gnu.org wrote:=0A>= > =0A>>> https://video.hardlimit.com/videos/watch/c0dfb36a-a84b-4363-8b1b= -17aeadd4aaaf=0A>> =0A>> Thanks! I think 7 minutes is too long; IMO we sh= ould aim for ~1mn=E2=80=931.5mn=0A>> at most as is currently the case. Al= so full screen, large enough fonts,=0A>> no =E2=80=9Cguix pull=E2=80=9D w= arnings, =E2=80=98--max-jobs=3D1=E2=80=99 on the daemon side to reduce=0A= >> verbosity. Slick and to-the-point! :-)=0A>> =0A>> The video is really = long mainly because each command takes literally=0A>> ages. Well the "XDG= mine" step to be precise; maybe Joshua you have=0A>> something misconfig= ured.=0A> =0A> If the slowness at the end can be avoided by configuring s= omething, I'd like to know, because that=0A> slowness is always the case = in my experience. For example, installing the program Joshua mentioned=0A= > earlier, wf-recorder, which is quite small, took ~7 minutes in my compu= ter (Intel=C2=AE Core=E2=84=A2 i3-8100=0A> CPU @ 3.60GHz =C3=97 4, 4 GiB = RAM, 1 TB HDD).=0A> =0A> Also, in my case, it is common for guix commands= to take long seconds to display any feedback when=0A> called. Actually, = the current video shows guix working at a speed I've never experienced my= self.=0A> =0A> So I wonder if the video should include these inconvenienc= es, which people will find once they=0A> install the software. I wouldn't= like the video or anything in the website to feel like false,=0A> mainst= ream advertising.