Hi Roel, > This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. > > roelj pushed a commit to branch master > in repository guix. > > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: > new 0574446 gnu: Add r-bisquerna. > 0574446 is described below > > commit 0574446be82ef54b925441e4283bf754a86918a9 > Author: Roel Janssen <roel@gnu.org> > AuthorDate: Wed Sep 9 17:02:55 2020 +0200 > > gnu: Add r-bisquerna. > > * gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (r-bisquerna): New variable. > --- > gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm b/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm > index f8792ef..9f2fd86 100644 > --- a/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm > +++ b/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm > @@ -7923,6 +7923,31 @@ manipulating genomic intervals and variables defined along a genome.") > on Bioconductor or which replace R functions.") > (license license:artistic2.0))) > > +(define-public r-bisquerna > + (package > + (name "r-bisquerna") > + (version "1.0.4") > + (source (origin > + (method url-fetch) > + (uri (cran-uri "BisqueRNA" version)) > + (sha256 > + (base32 > + "01g34n87ml7n3pck77497ddgbv3rr5p4153ac8ninpgjijlm3jw2")))) Why is this in (gnu packages bioinformatics) and not in (gnu packages cran)? > + (synopsis "Decomposition of Bulk Expression with Single-Cell > Sequencing") Please use lowercase where it would be normally used. -- Ricardo
Hi Ricardo, On Wed, 2020-09-09 at 18:04 +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Hi Roel, > > > This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. > > > > roelj pushed a commit to branch master > > in repository guix. > > > > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this > > push: > > new 0574446 gnu: Add r-bisquerna. > > 0574446 is described below > > > > commit 0574446be82ef54b925441e4283bf754a86918a9 > > Author: Roel Janssen <roel@gnu.org> > > AuthorDate: Wed Sep 9 17:02:55 2020 +0200 > > > > gnu: Add r-bisquerna. > > > > * gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (r-bisquerna): New variable. > > --- > > gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm > > b/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm > > index f8792ef..9f2fd86 100644 > > --- a/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm > > +++ b/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm > > @@ -7923,6 +7923,31 @@ manipulating genomic intervals and variables > > defined along a genome.") > > on Bioconductor or which replace R functions.") > > (license license:artistic2.0))) > > > > +(define-public r-bisquerna > > + (package > > + (name "r-bisquerna") > > + (version "1.0.4") > > + (source (origin > > + (method url-fetch) > > + (uri (cran-uri "BisqueRNA" version)) > > + (sha256 > > + (base32 > > + "01g34n87ml7n3pck77497ddgbv3rr5p4153ac8ninpgjijlm3jw > > 2")))) > > Why is this in (gnu packages bioinformatics) and not in (gnu packages > cran)? It seemed so "bioinformatics"-specific. But you're right, it's a CRAN package, so that may be a better fit. Shall I move it to CRAN? > > + (synopsis "Decomposition of Bulk Expression with Single-Cell > > Sequencing") > > Please use lowercase where it would be normally used. My mistake. I will take better care of this in the future. Kind regards, Roel Janssen
Roel Janssen <roel@gnu.org> writes: >> > +(define-public r-bisquerna >> > + (package >> > + (name "r-bisquerna") >> > + (version "1.0.4") >> > + (source (origin >> > + (method url-fetch) >> > + (uri (cran-uri "BisqueRNA" version)) >> > + (sha256 >> > + (base32 >> > + "01g34n87ml7n3pck77497ddgbv3rr5p4153ac8ninpgjijlm3jw >> > 2")))) >> >> Why is this in (gnu packages bioinformatics) and not in (gnu packages >> cran)? > > It seemed so "bioinformatics"-specific. But you're right, it's a CRAN > package, so that may be a better fit. Shall I move it to CRAN? If you have time to do that, yes please. Some time ago I started a half-hearted migration of R packages from (gnu packages bioinformatics) to (gnu packages cran) and (gnu packages bioconductor). It’s not supremely important, but I think in the long term we’d like to have CRAN things in (gnu packages cran) and Bioconductor things in (gnu packages bioconductor), because it’s deliciously unsurprising. :) >> > + (synopsis "Decomposition of Bulk Expression with Single-Cell >> > Sequencing") >> >> Please use lowercase where it would be normally used. > > My mistake. I will take better care of this in the future. Thank you! Perhaps we could sprinkle some smarts over the CRAN importer to do this automatically, but with R packages we often have names of methods that should be upper case (like “Bayes*” or “SNPs”), so I have shied away from developing heuristics for that. Thanks for adding more R packages! -- Ricardo
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 13:30, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> wrote: > > It seemed so "bioinformatics"-specific. But you're right, it's a CRAN > > package, so that may be a better fit. Shall I move it to CRAN? > > If you have time to do that, yes please. Some time ago I started a > half-hearted migration of R packages from (gnu packages bioinformatics) > to (gnu packages cran) and (gnu packages bioconductor). It’s not > supremely important, but I think in the long term we’d like to have CRAN > things in (gnu packages cran) and Bioconductor things in (gnu packages > bioconductor), because it’s deliciously unsurprising. :) I agree. And it is also on my TODO but the Copyright lines lead to a boring task. :-) Does it make sense to add a subsection to: https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/guix.html#Packaging-Guidelines about R packages? Cheers, simon
zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 13:30, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> wrote: > >> > It seemed so "bioinformatics"-specific. But you're right, it's a CRAN >> > package, so that may be a better fit. Shall I move it to CRAN? >> >> If you have time to do that, yes please. Some time ago I started a >> half-hearted migration of R packages from (gnu packages bioinformatics) >> to (gnu packages cran) and (gnu packages bioconductor). It’s not >> supremely important, but I think in the long term we’d like to have CRAN >> things in (gnu packages cran) and Bioconductor things in (gnu packages >> bioconductor), because it’s deliciously unsurprising. :) > > I agree. And it is also on my TODO but the Copyright lines lead to a > boring task. :-) It becomes a little easier with “git log --grep=package-name”. > Does it make sense to add a subsection to: > https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/guix.html#Packaging-Guidelines > about R packages? Perhaps not. I think it may not be necessary because we don’t have that many people contributing R packages to us and the manual already has a lot of information that might be overwhelming. So far we’ve been doing fine without it. It’s a really minor point, in my opinion. -- Ricardo
On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 13:31 +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Roel Janssen <roel@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > > > +(define-public r-bisquerna
> > > > + (package
> > > > + (name "r-bisquerna")
> > > > + (version "1.0.4")
> > > > + (source (origin
> > > > + (method url-fetch)
> > > > + (uri (cran-uri "BisqueRNA" version))
> > > > + (sha256
> > > > + (base32
> > > > + "01g34n87ml7n3pck77497ddgbv3rr5p4153ac8ninpgjijl
> > > > m3jw
> > > > 2"))))
> > >
> > > Why is this in (gnu packages bioinformatics) and not in (gnu
> > > packages
> > > cran)?
> >
> > It seemed so "bioinformatics"-specific. But you're right, it's a
> > CRAN
> > package, so that may be a better fit. Shall I move it to CRAN?
>
> If you have time to do that, yes please. Some time ago I started a
> half-hearted migration of R packages from (gnu packages
> bioinformatics)
> to (gnu packages cran) and (gnu packages bioconductor). It’s not
> supremely important, but I think in the long term we’d like to have
> CRAN
> things in (gnu packages cran) and Bioconductor things in (gnu
> packages
> bioconductor), because it’s deliciously unsurprising. :)
I fully agree that it would be nice to have all packages originating
from CRAN in (gnu packages cram) and all things Bioconductor in (gnu
packages bioconductor).
I moved r-bisquerna and lowercased its synopsis in
66be746dc0c0f4ba3d748ed8d0983b2f9afdace8.
Kind regards,
Roel Janssen
Dear, On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 16:44, Roel Janssen <roel@gnu.org> wrote: > > If you have time to do that, yes please. Some time ago I started a > > half-hearted migration of R packages from (gnu packages > > bioinformatics) > > to (gnu packages cran) and (gnu packages bioconductor). It’s not > > supremely important, but I think in the long term we’d like to have > > CRAN > > things in (gnu packages cran) and Bioconductor things in (gnu > > packages > > bioconductor), because it’s deliciously unsurprising. :) > > I fully agree that it would be nice to have all packages originating > from CRAN in (gnu packages cram) and all things Bioconductor in (gnu > packages bioconductor). I have tried to move almost all the CRAN remaining from (gnu packages bioinformatics) graphs and machine-learning in 43345 <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/43345>. Now, still missing the Bioconductor ones. And the *big* statistics... Cheers, simon