From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id QBA6FuGid19gGAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 22:00:01 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 4HUaEuGid1/KSwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 22:00:01 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2E6B94042F for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 22:00:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:51382 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kOT5r-00028R-ME for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 17:59:59 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34670) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kOT5O-000272-9d for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 17:59:30 -0400 Received: from smtp.hosts.co.uk ([85.233.160.19]:42031) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kOT5M-0007IL-Dj for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 17:59:30 -0400 Received: from maikeh336.claranet.co.uk ([79.123.23.187] helo=pancake.local) by smtp.hosts.co.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim) (envelope-from ) id 1kOT5J-0007Qr-EQ; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 22:59:25 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Licensing issue with Gmsh? From: Paul Garlick To: zimoun Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 22:59:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: none client-ip=85.233.160.19; envelope-from=pgarlick@tourbillion-technology.com; helo=smtp.hosts.co.uk X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/02 17:59:25 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.49 X-TUID: H1vk8zUHXQwp Hi Simon, > There is only a parmetis.c file included in the metis directory. > However, it is commented out in CMakeLists.txt. > To be "Guix compliant", this parametis.c file should be removed, > right? The file is part of METIS and thereby covered by the Apache license. It only provides entry points for ParMETIS, so ignoring it in the build stage, in the way that Gmsh does, seems to be appropriate. However, I notice from the patch that the Guix package metis is included as an input. This means that the whole of the bundled 'contrib/metis' directory could be deleted after all. If I remember correctly CMake gives preference to the 'system' packages ahead of the bundled packages. Best regards, Paul.