From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hartmut Goebel <h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com>
Subject: Re: 23/36: gnu: Add libkdepim.
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 10:31:41 +0100
Message-ID: <a6b89325-4ff6-7989-d4a8-b192f1b2d7dc@crazy-compilers.com>
References: <20200203134554.28985.49673@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
 <20200203134603.BDAB420A10@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <875zgmugtx.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48983)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com>) id 1izH2G-00089s-IT
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 04:31:53 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com>) id 1izH2D-0002VZ-Ey
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 04:31:52 -0500
In-Reply-To: <875zgmugtx.fsf@gnu.org>
Content-Language: en-US
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel"
 <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=c3=a8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Am 04.02.20 um 23:29 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s:
> This must get us close to full coverage of the core of KDE, no?

Well, nor t yet. I have yet another approx. 100 packages hanging around.


>> +    (synopsis "Libraries for common kdepim apps")
>> +    (description "Libraries for common kdepim apps.")
> I know it=E2=80=99s no fun, but could you try to follow the guidelines =
for
> synopses and descriptions at:

Whet exactly is your point? I assume it is that summary and description
are quite meaningless. I agree on this.

I'm afraid, there is nothing to say about some of these packages. They
are used by KDE PIM only, there is no Readme and no description. Debian
also does not provide more infos.

The only change which makes sense IMHO is to add something like=C2=A0 "Th=
is
library is used by KDE PIM" to the description. (Or change the
description to only state this.)

WDYT?

--=20
Regards
Hartmut Goebel

| Hartmut Goebel          | h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com               |
| www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |