From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id 2LSGN3dE2maScwEAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 23:53:28 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id 2LSGN3dE2maScwEAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 01:53:28 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=YdylJHik; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=riseup.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1725580407; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=F754qRZr+wm6Qt/xbDATx2fNaddep4lTsWv+pqNBf6U=; b=RdEi/SEbOIwYZT/a1cwtAChrYDbmft0bLdWyEl/wG1MNY1bg0CAaNZoOGPfnd29Csksav7 IhvYjsiaC4poaqrj3O4Lhb2LgEv2x5Z3Lv9f3eRDvUBA6HzGtJXq5Rk2tJm+17akyDP2h8 x9r82iOsoD7YYzO/wb0Cacv5R6ZCqDA68ZO97RGeo7tQWvb30NGi3a6AD1kmvWHRb065GP jsmA4ivNCJGrbaEG0N8JbaQmSLuJdfhTWjNjuKctOlS57KxZUaeLxyq6Iog2btX990d2rN whhXWot/OXPNlrhvHWsnTfbp++k1/cKJvNN7tn9Vp0xYvNEJhDqJyA8N4hSujQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1725580407; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=a6RE0sZkiwpYWk/1E+4wzR90gJ9jsXzbZvL9V5IhYrw864zBoP5KWrQaV3CCIm6tNMLnMd lvafLXakUUHftzJjihvfeayHAz+9jnBBPSNTfVUTKlPmSAzELiyez0LTvf8F16pL34KiFJ 0XPDCIA0D7/faMOyfP3ET6g3i/Nw7R0bNEejLDDsvKoicT/1rdhgAjAY/C8ELhRzTV2ypC tOpRnOLkPWgpKdZsMUjC9N1NokP7lpU+5mCHmmUCsVvmFP0GHJZHNvy29Aeq42DQv9c2NW I/mhqwna2WvyzXKj38kP6Si7AGssBncMi7mg92MC0iI6/UK3nM0PykbwBFmC9Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=YdylJHik; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=riseup.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FE4E713DF for ; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 01:53:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1smMHW-0005fr-L7; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 19:52:54 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1smMHV-0005fg-Br for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 19:52:53 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1smMHT-0004It-Sf for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 19:52:53 -0400 Received: from fews02-sea.riseup.net (fews02-sea-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.112]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4X0GPt5H7ZzDqK1; Thu, 5 Sep 2024 23:52:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1725580370; bh=w/T0FE8drq3CGmWp+fnPqEdOl6d6GF9qwCRCH97Aaus=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=YdylJHikqTfsFoBW3wVyUQllito9Pk5OTC/EASUP3eP7cXeLtu0jW69bKKlUgM8VM fe/LjeWwIxz4WrK5Z/3oPbQVVvSDM8+aG4qUP6n7TChT8EFyixEfDu2w8TtclSlb7l Zsqa6q8OhTtVQWOfCETZFaENNcNKSfm4jXJTWMMI= X-Riseup-User-ID: 284DB04CD35391A874C49017B0CC58580C4D10F4C62472D524F64F450ECCC5A1 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews02-sea.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4X0GPf1ky2zFsZr; Thu, 5 Sep 2024 23:52:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 20:52:34 -0300 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Batista To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: Leo Famulari , 67535@debbugs.gnu.org, guix-devel@gnu.org, Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: Does anyone use i686-linux? [was Re: bug#67535: ci.guix.gnu.org 'Cannot allocate memory' while building for i686-linux] Message-ID: References: <87sevsxtqg.fsf@elephly.net> <87le06mo6m.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87le06mo6m.fsf@elephly.net> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.252.153.129; envelope-from=nandre@riseup.net; helo=mx1.riseup.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -7.50 X-Spam-Score: -7.50 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 8FE4E713DF X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-TUID: bhn0OlDpomGs qui 05 set 2024 às 11:42:41 (1725547361), rekado@elephly.net enviou: > André Batista writes: > > >> > Keeping this to i686-linux specifically, what generation of hardware > >> > supports i686 but not x86_64? Some (very) quick checking on wikipedia > >> > suggests that the x60 from 2006 was either 32-bit or 64-bit, and I > >> > believe there was an atom chip from 2015 that was 32-bit. Specifically, > >> > that makes the newest hardware (at least from the CPU perspective) 10 > >> > years old at least. > >> > >> FWIW, I'm using one of those Atom chips in a netbook for an installation > >> of Sugar Desktop. I upgrade it every few months or so. If I'm the only > >> user of i686-linux I would not want to condemn the project to supporting > >> the architecture for my sake. > > > > For the record, I'm another one still using those atom netbooks. > > I just noticed that my Atom-powered netbook should also be able to run > an x86_64 system. I'll try to upgrade today; if this is successful I > won't have any i686 system left at home. Lucky you! Mine is an Intel Atom N270 which is 32-bit only...