From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0Bi9Inbwo2apPQAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 18:52:38 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0Bi9Inbwo2apPQAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 20:52:38 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b="O f/gqVP"; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=CK1URDDT; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1722019958; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=mrmRZy4SbB0NkJzO0xEe/MHsxtnYzWg18ZOqum1xcCk=; b=ftLKVtb9m2kL8gwdigMw5I8V9BxYviUBLfrqYNWCyopulw0+gLG8LdEPR8/Plk2CB7ZCsL /hIj568kxOUusuP4OdJ+lzdXa8lrUbbBC8TsvXRzY3KPK5uPwOckkQ28rhtrC07nQ303W8 0IZtp07/RQ8O5ZcyN+IBwAJBpQxjgl14Y8os6Af44+FirzNWWwgVP7ipkowxZhzJNV05zG siCfhJ0WcFa3bsLj9Wg+6blSyuy4MRaJX7qOczbWTv5xManwUP5hL7UjJ0jvT4j+ZXPKTv T/2Y559zODwJZYMMBw6Vp6mFRIPrP5Ni54KMvptLf6xqQdz0aS8WDAY0Oy6sHQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1722019958; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=tCgKSwX4LvDDcB9oaXm0X2kDhp/UKpqnmKrgTaZxVt8Ic13nIUZFpXvEiN6niO53Qn9gPU 1uDV7NtTAsBLs1RrDGDM5kE3O71lDtJfKYrwIQ9mF6YJf4iNKcP7k1Qs6m2eO8CF3SvTis nfbO/A1wIj+/ywgr7FDoq3HKLenj0MiJRlKaXZ0rFCtQtR9yGwM+2qk+bfGXTABMPab22D S91wNe90bUX4kG8ikQ/mwv8mSFWIM9PYWP+DSSLEb/puh+/pdoWHr1hFofRGXGJ91Ymiz3 YKVUi9A+4EET13GfnRHhKCjaL4GBLFgo/OQj5iR+am1t2ib0Sj3sXNsgFLZE2g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b="O f/gqVP"; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=CK1URDDT; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D04FB1D523 for ; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 20:52:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sXQ2n-0005kt-21; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 14:51:57 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sXQ2l-0005kb-A9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 14:51:55 -0400 Received: from fhigh5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.156]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sXQ2j-0001gc-Fi for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 14:51:55 -0400 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailfhigh.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686A61140142; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 14:51:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 26 Jul 2024 14:51:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; t=1722019912; x= 1722106312; bh=mrmRZy4SbB0NkJzO0xEe/MHsxtnYzWg18ZOqum1xcCk=; b=O f/gqVP5UE2pJGQDJGgVaUrMXhFMeP6BY6dam6O0CoMpQOgiUHOPjEggNIzEFVKD1 6m437DlUztfgogA+pwG/dNZeDl3ehvJ6uuPM1R2MaFcFXrRG+N5VFyw/Mjc3iFxs fpdaDY8OsS77XNQ1pRZcaxpCGbCrgXl4kPHSrPIJL4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; t=1722019912; x=1722106312; bh=mrmRZy4SbB0NkJzO0xEe/MHsxtnY zWg18ZOqum1xcCk=; b=CK1URDDT1yxJRCsV3l4x5RnG7mRBVEATCmn1OMo2/W+R SCsZ/+aVsp9mqfFGBO5DLuDM1AOwqc1K0n2ipmitAywIyHLE/Jg0fdqyaF1J2AvC yMFtC3TZW1nDjSHkSmlW1RxI8e+k2vRaUI/OkyVGycWJeDIBz9BujM0n5KKQnGdR 3sy+cW0uE+hV9IWhxWT98b1/3LO2ec2szgKuzJi+xq4q8lktCj7CELyqdMWVFh2Q 7FjiEVPl8f52gLNvfrjJMukE3tU6KNZaAzOrABRv51wUvGE23ny0fklDGSr+5V/0 H6a98r6wMNwaG2Qrp+JjcaDUT1/tIQ2zm5UP4h+BZg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrieehgddufeefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvvefukfhfgggtuggjsehttd ertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhl rghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeetheeuvdeivdelueeukefhtdeihe dtgefhvddvlefhudejudeiheelfeevteeuhfenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhdrohhrghen ucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghose hfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedt X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 14:51:51 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 14:51:49 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: 67535@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Does anyone use i686-linux? [was Re: bug#67535: ci.guix.gnu.org 'Cannot allocate memory' while building for i686-linux] Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=103.168.172.156; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=fhigh5-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Queue-Id: D04FB1D523 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -10.12 X-Spam-Score: -10.12 X-TUID: haw4yI6UeqSg For a long time we've not been able to build linux-libre on i686-linux because the source unpacking process runs out of memory. I'm forwarding this bug to guix-devel to get more attention. Is anybody actually using i686-linux anymore? Or should we begin to officially remove support for it?