From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id AKuTAshUZma53wAAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 01:20:08 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id AKuTAshUZma53wAAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 03:20:08 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b="z FHNRr6"; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=ppNzUQVg; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1717982408; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=eEkwciSiwTKJfy9MhzgbRKgTkpBYGiz3hGKuPXmVcfMKpx/JOA4El93SwTMDFendMO/QRC 1KYI7fgoO8XcxcH/BG2tHMgiMF6X4sEcY1JEUeqDPHmvmETLNAFseDSoZ7Wdvvc2sCWBo0 Ya5JdirEqGoCqtCg/nhWO9FIEEKaaiL/zGIY4MCD//Swpme3QGxIVtHUfM2X+zudqA91KS 41/+IaxrfLzOkrC4wOdZcaANe+ogw3AagPDhHuM9PaDR+sT0QdAdP0brnO0/xqZ4ZjrGNy F5s09g7gGfgUC1ZEABoBYOldivRJe3LJoN+k1Ngk+RXLaZli5GZhuMgAQXrUqw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b="z FHNRr6"; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=ppNzUQVg; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1717982408; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=Aez/MgN/pwq1/YsM42AjzvjckkE1hgt92EPpHnjlCv8=; b=iF9I3xx6aZd3Hu3MXC5gRS1EffRWMk9ja9sPQq/Est/rfOaQWGFICCNtHf0rRashYSK2hp HOF1WqxCnDe33U1Jw2AI4zvMhRoLkQqTtUGzMlIpAC57jCjpXBuTOi0lXxsndn1XnjiX06 VWXnZpSa6rfOWJB3pQ46QS9uJ2dIECIaWOQzS3t8ebMozHsk7KzZFhfIupufDltd/Lw8sl JeFbWyW0IdKCG2kO8+yLw3OklDAYN+eUDZa3mCNEVM/W7hR6t+7cgVRG3PPXAYd4qa+gLo Z+C7UfIisg03fH3jetPfTeRImL3zhLz4aGtWaZ+bfmIpbAEW7lJA7lO/RbU8oQ== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 006966D5FA for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 03:20:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sGTh0-0002nM-Oq; Sun, 09 Jun 2024 21:19:26 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sGTgy-0002mv-Jl for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2024 21:19:24 -0400 Received: from wfout7-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.150]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sGTgw-000599-18; Sun, 09 Jun 2024 21:19:24 -0400 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailfout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09CB41C0017B; Sun, 9 Jun 2024 21:19:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 09 Jun 2024 21:19:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; t=1717982356; x= 1718068756; bh=Aez/MgN/pwq1/YsM42AjzvjckkE1hgt92EPpHnjlCv8=; b=z FHNRr6OO06NdhjOUHtDgRC+P2h+uFW7iv5helhX5PL0ND5cc9ejqU6YRmQmaUe7K Xobk8rbmn5lVGU+g7OVf6zcMPUJAeMl2uw/1rDEeJwYZZX1Hf62lUP8Mm4PViEbG oedsPoJ/y71FvucAvcUMV224PeJ1ycfnUAvuxMMUnQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; t=1717982356; x=1718068756; bh=Aez/MgN/pwq1/YsM42AjzvjckkE1 hgt92EPpHnjlCv8=; b=ppNzUQVgCxsgubVW/qwW0htdq1Di+jIOFNyRb469lbkg v63W/MFrmkh9GSMbzCreLp1Q5kHr3qCRrItH1GiK0Cj3grwpH8cp8FGucfXbpkTe z1DGmkfNn8XiBGtNOwXBGI7zFTOL0RcGjmbcKjUM5ScFvA8ISSYBO22JZKVQLmOv G6nX8GogZhurrf/oVWR7NxDxRmos6fj63tG43FoMWNhbXl5SLybIT2T4xdfF5JTR ajup7q1MmsB14aE6HPSByF5CBeCvmD2uq5XueDi7Nf9eHiTxXy6LzysoyikOw676 qOHj9FEdrJCLxnzyB7hj4E8nsJMQ5iPc3lt9rkcyjQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrfedtkedggeegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcu hfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepteegfffgiefhvefgveehtdegjefgfefhhfevffefueffheevtdfftdfggeev ledtnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhdpghhnuhdrohhrghenucevlhhush htvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhl rghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 9 Jun 2024 21:19:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 21:19:14 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: Kaelyn Cc: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= , guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: 02/02: gnu: linux-libre: Update to 6.9. Message-ID: References: <171746516380.7429.1293440427932042426@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20240604013924.59F27C1F9EA@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87r0dd8b10.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.150; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=wfout7-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 006966D5FA X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -9.46 X-Spam-Score: -9.46 X-TUID: te20JFGpIbQn On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 09:00:59PM +0000, Kaelyn wrote: > As a ZFS user, I'd like to offer a bit of clarification: zfs-auto-snapshot doesn't depend on any specific kernel versions, but zfs itself does. For example, zfs 2.2.3 supports up to kernel 6.7, and zfs 2.2.4 supports up to kernel 6.8 (ref: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/releases). I suspect zfs is failing to build with the default kernel as a dependency of zfs-auto-snapshot. You're right, it was ZFS itself failing to build. I'm sorry I missed that and didn't include sufficient info in my earlier message: ------ checking whether bdev_open_by_path() exists... configure: error: *** None of the expected "blkdev_get_by_path()" interfaces were detected. *** This may be because your kernel version is newer than what is *** supported, or you are using a patched custom kernel with *** incompatible modifications. *** *** ZFS Version: zfs-2.2.3-1 *** Compatible Kernels: 3.10 - 6.7 error: in phase 'really-configure': uncaught exception: %exception #<&invoke-error program: "./configure" arguments: ("--with-config=all" "--prefix=/gnu/store/x5sg337jfb7d7q26a1fv7zwc4mxpy6d8-zfs-2.2.3" "--with-dracutdir=/gnu/store/x5sg337jfb7d7q26a1fv7zwc4mxpy6d8-zfs-2.2.3/lib/dracut" "--with-udevdir=/gnu/store/x5sg337jfb7d7q26a1fv7zwc4mxpy6d8-zfs-2.2.3/lib/udev" "--with-mounthelperdir=/gnu/store/x5sg337jfb7d7q26a1fv7zwc4mxpy6d8-zfs-2.2.3/sbin" "--with-linux=/gnu/store/yi2cs6akr2anyci1bzqn6sfwwmrw1q9d-linux-libre-module-builder-6.9.3/lib/modules/build") exit-status: 1 term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f> phase `really-configure' failed after 42.6 seconds command "./configure" "--with-config=all" "--prefix=/gnu/store/x5sg337jfb7d7q26a1fv7zwc4mxpy6d8-zfs-2.2.3" "--with-dracutdir=/gnu/store/x5sg337jfb7d7q26a1fv7zwc4mxpy6d8-zfs-2.2.3/lib/dracut" "--with-udevdir=/gnu/store/x5sg337jfb7d7q26a1fv7zwc4mxpy6d8-zfs-2.2.3/lib/udev" "--with-mounthelperdir=/gnu/store/x5sg337jfb7d7q26a1fv7zwc4mxpy6d8-zfs-2.2.3/sbin" "--with-linux=/gnu/store/yi2cs6akr2anyci1bzqn6sfwwmrw1q9d-linux-libre-module-builder-6.9.3/lib/modules/build" failed with status 1 builder for `/gnu/store/a3ag0m0hk2pqw446c3j5b7axzrg10h38-zfs-2.2.3.drv' failed with exit code 1 ------ Should we change something about zfs-auto-snapshot? Or is the status quo okay? > P.S. If there is interest, I can see about submitting my custom ZFS packages. I split it so that the "zfs" package is just the user-space tools without the kernel module (which should also make it substitutable since it no longer includes binaries with combined GPL and CDDL code), and created a function "make-zfs-for-kernel" that generates a package containing just the kernel modules, built for the given kernel package. This also addresses the issue of the zfs package depending on a kernel package that may or may not be needed (and which it may not compile against), and the user having to create a custom non-substitutable version--including all of the user-space tools--for the specific kernel they are running. I'm aware of the licensing issues around ZFS, but I haven't used ZFS so I don't know anything about the finer points of how it is packaged and distributed for Linux / Linux-libre. If you think your packages would be useful to people using Guix System, and that they satisfy the Guix project's commitments under the Free System Distribution Guidelines, then I do recommend you submit them! https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html