From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id AGx8EtMGc2WRVAAA9RJhRA:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 08 Dec 2023 13:06:43 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id AGx8EtMGc2WRVAAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 08 Dec 2023 13:06:43 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1700633553 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2023 13:06:43 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=6xq.net header.s=MBO0001 header.b=jcbgE8me; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=6xq.net ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1702037203; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=ynzjQajNP+irGMrOH8HcrxrIUybwSIdxu3/BGLZhNLw=; b=mJBjTe6Qwn1+wlQk4b8nK+C+DM+YwAkfbFpRuEODyqDVenf8+1H7lSOmvEM44WFofT+Amc at+3bIrPRujBrIfdfV7FDE/E5e02Z9LgFAtUJEFzI/ijP2FYLZvh/r8sstP4wugRp6GzI2 MgJFktjxQNNC3Zr8wYNCE19Sguo+xOJ6T6GMuJlSu+LW68zDjWtzzFnkk8Nq80w4e/Aks7 KbTHu5Ze4X13e6tUb+3APexa6SScYTStC31yjx504sPXqnMz/zYfR7MQOrzF9nPf12dNPS 1M/mGe7VIKo36HE2S3IVFNAfRZKh9mYtC+cajApSqXoOJj4B9aBYgYOZWTJ3RA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=6xq.net header.s=MBO0001 header.b=jcbgE8me; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=6xq.net ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1702037203; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=TTlxsGhJsc7/GcsPb/BU2deS9GkG02B1HyplZXwsEHMA9OMk56sxUMGGKttFxszcY6PwRu OAB1r7ZZn+EhXs6GOQ6SDZhdv501zAaPw/Nk9DmnmqBzQJjq9Oqzfiv5YMTBujE5gBHQQD 38f83lHoJ6+4ZqM99CzdobHaJuQzz08zjXMqhbdZjU13kzAYZvS70L1snQMOwJyA9XC+r8 VkhTjQS8G/wA5jNjOLjuKamjBHkufjY+BGvUpcckgYvls6aIOD+ORS6Jrprb8j6W0+tsDg BSErdoB2zIiBycbf6J2itodHkFeekVkZ+NbDWyj68GtZp49vJfk7FCvBlZDtSw== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rBZcU-0006H7-58; Fri, 08 Dec 2023 07:06:14 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rBZcM-0006Ge-Nz for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2023 07:06:06 -0500 Received: from mout-p-201.mailbox.org ([2001:67c:2050:0:465::201]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rBZcI-0003iZ-4i for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2023 07:06:04 -0500 Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [10.196.197.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-201.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Smqbc1FFvz9sSM; Fri, 8 Dec 2023 13:05:48 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6xq.net; s=MBO0001; t=1702037148; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ynzjQajNP+irGMrOH8HcrxrIUybwSIdxu3/BGLZhNLw=; b=jcbgE8meQuXKZkfaGey36VnvpdnBfnUkWj5RGnQnHHVtb4m1UaVyVTSfJZq8OKnTvyXOT2 x+QDk8XcML8Bn74s9rkhyhsz7BDqk3r6bjbEHKU7czj+uNh6fRYGnyzoZbAd0ofxbXtpQU j+N04dTpbSvcsj3bFlBSeUq5qSJj5tZfDiKqgbbJSGGE09PYS9avgUC2QLW15TdY7f8yxd I/wPA9Fj+MzuQkoeED6HoQj+mfiDUCy/mQsivdV1lOe/d8sC3TtzzKH/hhbcihcdm5wU8l /xmE0kqHBAzPWi0EtZ8s/Wh85tceLtfKJ+TbydjqNbEDP7EKAWTAUcLnsez21w== Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 13:05:43 +0100 From: Lars-Dominik Braun To: Saku Laesvuori Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: Should commits rather be buildable or small Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:67c:2050:0:465::201; envelope-from=lars@6xq.net; helo=mout-p-201.mailbox.org X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.49 X-Spam-Score: -4.49 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 1700633553 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-TUID: AFJAJ/ZVEBxP Hi, > I'm planning on refreshing Guix's haskell packages as my fix for > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/66347 requires rebuilding all of them > anyway. Should I try to keep commits small with only one update per > commit (which is more work but managable if I don't care about the > commits being buildable) or should I try to keep them buildable (i.e. > update everything in one commit)? so far I’ve been updating Haskell packages in bulk in a single commit. See 49a320aaa6fb4c20d6b30c56c35a8c7ffceed822 or b97f549b14402421fcfb360ddd4cff7de93b9af0 for example. I also used custom scripts last time, because `guix refresh` was not sufficient to update all fields required (arguments, inputs, …). This is hopefully different this time. Cheers, Lars