unofficial mirror of guix-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>
To: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>,
	Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com>,
	Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>,
	guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Better support remote deployment
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 02:33:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZVwI-QXfBq--AzYu@ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y1exu3hn.fsf@gnu.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2340 bytes --]

On 2023-11-16 16:23:00 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> skribis:
> 
> > Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com> writes:
> 
> [...]
> 
> >> How about a 'remote-user-profile'?
> >
> > 'guix package' is already the command we use to create profiles; maybe
> > it could accept a '--remote' argument to operate on a remote machine?
> > Or is this not what 'GUIX_DAEMON_SOCKET=ssh://your-target guix package
> > -m manifest.scm' can already accomplish? :-)
> 
> Doing that confuses ‘guix package’ because it’d try to perform the
> effectful part (switching symlinks) locally, even though everything was
> built on another machine.  (It’s also slow due to RPC round trips, as
> Efraim wrote.)
> 
> But yeah, I think we could do something along these lines by isolating
> the effectful bits and evaluating them remotely when needed, like we did
> to achieve code sharing between ‘guix deploy’ and ‘guix system
> reconfigure’.
> 
> That said, I wonder if this would really be more convenient than SSH’ing
> into the target machine and running the commands right there.  Perhaps
> I’m missing something about the use case?

I was following the debate, but maybe I have missed something, so I will put
forward my use case as well.  I have two properties I would like to have from a
"remote deploy" mechanism, and they are not satisfied by SSH-ing to the machine
and running the commands there.

1. No need for `guix pull'.  I run (a little) custom Guix, so running `guix
pull' is somewhat expensive.  I do not want to do it just to deploy something
(be it a system, or home, or profile).

2. No need to copy over the definitions.  My configurations are part of a git
repository, which I would like to keep local to just my development machine.  So
rsync-ing it over to the remote machine in order to run command there is
something I would like to avoid.

If, however, I can build a profile locally, `guix copy' it over, and *then* SSH
into the machine and somehow activate the profile (be it home or regular
profile), that would work for me.  Is that currently possible?

> 
> Ludo’.
>

Thanks,
Tomas

-- 
There are only two hard things in Computer Science:
cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-11-21  1:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-01 12:19 Better support remote deployment Ricardo Wurmus
2023-11-01 15:20 ` Felix Lechner via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
2023-11-02  9:59   ` Ricardo Wurmus
2023-11-07 19:07 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-11-07 19:45   ` Ricardo Wurmus
2023-11-08  2:12     ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-11-08  2:39       ` Felix Lechner via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
2023-11-08 14:36         ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-11-09  7:38           ` Efraim Flashner
2023-11-09 15:01             ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-11-16 15:23           ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-11-16 16:47             ` Felix Lechner via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
2023-11-21  1:33             ` Tomas Volf [this message]
2023-11-23  4:24               ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-12-10 13:49             ` Ricardo Wurmus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZVwI-QXfBq--AzYu@ws \
    --to=~@wolfsden.cz \
    --cc=felix.lechner@lease-up.com \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=ludo@gnu.org \
    --cc=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com \
    --cc=rekado@elephly.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).