* Guix / Nix Benchmarks
@ 2023-06-19 12:54 Nicolas Graves via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
2023-06-19 18:55 ` kiasoc5
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Graves via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution. @ 2023-06-19 12:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guix-devel
One of the criticism that can be read online about Guix (compared to
Nix) is its speed. I have never tried Nix and probably won't in a near
future, but I was wondering if some work has been made to compare them
on basic tasks (package installation, removal...) (the reason why I ask
is to be able to give an honest answer to someone hesitating between
both).
--
Best regards,
Nicolas Graves
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Guix / Nix Benchmarks
2023-06-19 12:54 Guix / Nix Benchmarks Nicolas Graves via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
@ 2023-06-19 18:55 ` kiasoc5
2023-06-20 5:24 ` Csepp
2023-06-20 9:14 ` Efraim Flashner
2023-06-20 10:45 ` W. T. Meyer
2023-08-19 12:11 ` Simon Tournier
2 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: kiasoc5 @ 2023-06-19 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicolas Graves, guix-devel
On 6/19/23 08:54, Nicolas Graves via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU
System distribution. wrote:
>
> One of the criticism that can be read online about Guix (compared to
> Nix) is its speed. I have never tried Nix and probably won't in a near
> future, but I was wondering if some work has been made to compare them
> on basic tasks (package installation, removal...) (the reason why I ask
> is to be able to give an honest answer to someone hesitating between
> both).
>
At least package installation is faster with Nix. One reason is that
Hydra (their "substitute server") has faster download speeds compared to
CI/Bordeaux, likely due to multiple geographical locations/mirrors.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Guix / Nix Benchmarks
2023-06-19 18:55 ` kiasoc5
@ 2023-06-20 5:24 ` Csepp
2023-06-20 9:14 ` Efraim Flashner
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Csepp @ 2023-06-20 5:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kiasoc5; +Cc: Nicolas Graves, guix-devel
kiasoc5 <kiasoc5@disroot.org> writes:
> On 6/19/23 08:54, Nicolas Graves via Development of GNU Guix and the
> GNU System distribution. wrote:
>> One of the criticism that can be read online about Guix (compared to
>> Nix) is its speed. I have never tried Nix and probably won't in a near
>> future, but I was wondering if some work has been made to compare them
>> on basic tasks (package installation, removal...) (the reason why I ask
>> is to be able to give an honest answer to someone hesitating between
>> both).
>>
>
> At least package installation is faster with Nix. One reason is that
> Hydra (their "substitute server") has faster download speeds compared
> to CI/Bordeaux, likely due to multiple geographical locations/mirrors.
Conversely, Nix itself is likely to be slower than Guile. I remember
search being so memory intensive with Nix that it got OOM killed even
with 4 GB of RAM, although they may have fixed that since.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Guix / Nix Benchmarks
2023-06-19 18:55 ` kiasoc5
2023-06-20 5:24 ` Csepp
@ 2023-06-20 9:14 ` Efraim Flashner
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Efraim Flashner @ 2023-06-20 9:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kiasoc5; +Cc: Nicolas Graves, guix-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1074 bytes --]
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 02:55:21PM -0400, kiasoc5 wrote:
> On 6/19/23 08:54, Nicolas Graves via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU
> System distribution. wrote:
> >
> > One of the criticism that can be read online about Guix (compared to
> > Nix) is its speed. I have never tried Nix and probably won't in a near
> > future, but I was wondering if some work has been made to compare them
> > on basic tasks (package installation, removal...) (the reason why I ask
> > is to be able to give an honest answer to someone hesitating between
> > both).
> >
>
> At least package installation is faster with Nix. One reason is that Hydra
> (their "substitute server") has faster download speeds compared to
> CI/Bordeaux, likely due to multiple geographical locations/mirrors.
I believe on the Nix side that includes a ~$9000/month bill for AWS.
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> רנשלפ םירפא
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Guix / Nix Benchmarks
2023-06-19 12:54 Guix / Nix Benchmarks Nicolas Graves via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
2023-06-19 18:55 ` kiasoc5
@ 2023-06-20 10:45 ` W. T. Meyer
2023-06-20 14:48 ` Nicolas Graves via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
2023-07-02 21:42 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2023-08-19 12:11 ` Simon Tournier
2 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: W. T. Meyer @ 2023-06-20 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicolas Graves; +Cc: guix-devel
Hi,
Nicolas Graves via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." <guix-devel@gnu.org> writes:
> One of the criticism that can be read online about Guix (compared to
> Nix) is its speed.
I am using guix as well as nix, and depending on the operation you're
performing there's not much of a noticeable difference (I usually tend
to build packages from source, so for most of the build process it
doesn't really matter what, as in guix or nix, calls the corresponding
build-system; as that's not too relevant during the build process in
terms of time relevance).
However, the download speed from the official substitute servers is
noticeable slower; but that's to be expected considering the resources^1
NixOS is allocating towards their binary/build caching efforts.
> I have never tried Nix and probably won't in a near
> future, but I was wondering if some work has been made to compare them
> on basic tasks (package installation, removal...) (the reason why I ask
> is to be able to give an honest answer to someone hesitating between
> both).
I'd personally advise against over-priotizing raw performance of package
management tasks as a feasible metric to choose a package manager by; as
having a "good enough" (which is highly subjective) performance should
be enough. In this context it'd be probably more helpful to have a look
at nix vs. guix cli tooling and nix as a language vs. guile basing your
decision upon that.
Regards,
Wilko Meyer
[1]: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/the-nixos-foundations-call-to-action-s3-costs-require-community-support/28672
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Guix / Nix Benchmarks
2023-06-20 10:45 ` W. T. Meyer
@ 2023-06-20 14:48 ` Nicolas Graves via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
2023-07-02 20:30 ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-07-02 21:42 ` Ricardo Wurmus
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Graves via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution. @ 2023-06-20 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: W. T. Meyer; +Cc: guix-devel
On 2023-06-20 12:45, W. T. Meyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Nicolas Graves via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." <guix-devel@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> One of the criticism that can be read online about Guix (compared to
>> Nix) is its speed.
>
> I am using guix as well as nix, and depending on the operation you're
> performing there's not much of a noticeable difference (I usually tend
> to build packages from source, so for most of the build process it
> doesn't really matter what, as in guix or nix, calls the corresponding
> build-system; as that's not too relevant during the build process in
> terms of time relevance).
>
> However, the download speed from the official substitute servers is
> noticeable slower; but that's to be expected considering the resources^1
> NixOS is allocating towards their binary/build caching efforts.
>
>> I have never tried Nix and probably won't in a near
>> future, but I was wondering if some work has been made to compare them
>> on basic tasks (package installation, removal...) (the reason why I ask
>> is to be able to give an honest answer to someone hesitating between
>> both).
>
> I'd personally advise against over-priotizing raw performance of package
> management tasks as a feasible metric to choose a package manager by; as
> having a "good enough" (which is highly subjective) performance should
> be enough. In this context it'd be probably more helpful to have a look
> at nix vs. guix cli tooling and nix as a language vs. guile basing your
> decision upon that.
I fully agree with this statement, over-priotizing raw performance was
not my point, and I won't change myself. I agree with the fact that
having a fair comparison would first require comparing tooling, although
I also think that keeping an eye on performance is not a waste either.
Then the "best" actual comparison might be the one done by Andrew Tropin
a few years ago, right here :
https://gist.github.com/abcdw/e54807b0a25e61fe2cf1bf8991410f83
Maybe we could get in touch with some nix folks to try to update, enrich
and maintain this kind of comparison up-to-date?
(I've seen that some nice reviewing has been done on NixOS by linux
"influencers" during the last week, and would like to also see Guix
benefit from that. Although both are not in competition, a fair and
shared comparison might help Guix grow in the space of Linux
distributions.)
>
> Regards,
>
> Wilko Meyer
>
> [1]: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/the-nixos-foundations-call-to-action-s3-costs-require-community-support/28672
--
Best regards,
Nicolas Graves
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Guix / Nix Benchmarks
2023-06-20 14:48 ` Nicolas Graves via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
@ 2023-07-02 20:30 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2023-07-02 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicolas Graves via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
Cc: W. T. Meyer, Nicolas Graves
Hi,
Nicolas Graves via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System
distribution." <guix-devel@gnu.org> skribis:
> Then the "best" actual comparison might be the one done by Andrew Tropin
> a few years ago, right here :
> https://gist.github.com/abcdw/e54807b0a25e61fe2cf1bf8991410f83
>
> Maybe we could get in touch with some nix folks to try to update, enrich
> and maintain this kind of comparison up-to-date?
It’d be useful to maintain such a comparison because it always comes up
in on-line discussions.
A comparison should included non-functional facets such as packaging
policies (free software, unbundling, building from source, etc.) as well
as social aspects (governance, economics, contribution workflow, etc.).
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Guix / Nix Benchmarks
2023-06-20 10:45 ` W. T. Meyer
2023-06-20 14:48 ` Nicolas Graves via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
@ 2023-07-02 21:42 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2023-07-02 22:02 ` Wilko Meyer
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Wurmus @ 2023-07-02 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: W. T. Meyer; +Cc: Nicolas Graves, guix-devel
"W. T. Meyer" <w@wmeyer.eu> writes:
> However, the download speed from the official substitute servers is
> noticeable slower; but that's to be expected considering the resources^1
> NixOS is allocating towards their binary/build caching efforts.
I’ve found download speeds to vary wildly dependent on where you are.
From an AWS EC2 instance in Frankfurt we get about 50MiB/s download
speeds from ci.guix.gnu.org, whereas some in France get sub 1MiB/s.
--
Ricardo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Guix / Nix Benchmarks
2023-07-02 21:42 ` Ricardo Wurmus
@ 2023-07-02 22:02 ` Wilko Meyer
2023-07-03 6:17 ` Ricardo Wurmus
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Wilko Meyer @ 2023-07-02 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ricardo Wurmus; +Cc: Nicolas Graves, guix-devel
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
> I’ve found download speeds to vary wildly dependent on where you are.
> From an AWS EC2 instance in Frankfurt we get about 50MiB/s download
> speeds from ci.guix.gnu.org, whereas some in France get sub 1MiB/s.
So, this could be an ISP related issue, e.g. maybe an issue regarding
peering capacities? As far as I know there have been historical issues
in this direction between commerical ISPs (namely DTAG being the one I'm
aware of) and educational networks such as X-WiN, so (without having any
deeper knowledge on Guixes situation on this) this could apply here as
well?
As ci.guix.gnu.org is hosted at AS210482/the Max-Delbrueck-Centrum, I
would guess that there could be something similar going on causing this,
e.g. commerical ISP trying to enforce their double payed traffic
strategies and the educational networks where ci.guix.gnu.org is hosted
(rightfully) not participating in that/not having direct peering with
these ISPs ASNs?
Regards,
Wilko Meyer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Guix / Nix Benchmarks
2023-07-02 22:02 ` Wilko Meyer
@ 2023-07-03 6:17 ` Ricardo Wurmus
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Wurmus @ 2023-07-03 6:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wilko Meyer; +Cc: Nicolas Graves, guix-devel
Wilko Meyer <w@wmeyer.eu> writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>> I’ve found download speeds to vary wildly dependent on where you are.
>> From an AWS EC2 instance in Frankfurt we get about 50MiB/s download
>> speeds from ci.guix.gnu.org, whereas some in France get sub 1MiB/s.
>
> So, this could be an ISP related issue, e.g. maybe an issue regarding
> peering capacities? As far as I know there have been historical issues
> in this direction between commerical ISPs (namely DTAG being the one I'm
> aware of) and educational networks such as X-WiN, so (without having any
> deeper knowledge on Guixes situation on this) this could apply here as
> well?
>
> As ci.guix.gnu.org is hosted at AS210482/the Max-Delbrueck-Centrum, I
> would guess that there could be something similar going on causing this,
> e.g. commerical ISP trying to enforce their double payed traffic
> strategies and the educational networks where ci.guix.gnu.org is hosted
> (rightfully) not participating in that/not having direct peering with
> these ISPs ASNs?
Yes, this is our guess. The head node and ~24 nodes of the Berlin build
farm are hosted in the MDC data center, which is hooked up to the
internet via the DFN network IIUC.
--
Ricardo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Guix / Nix Benchmarks
2023-06-19 12:54 Guix / Nix Benchmarks Nicolas Graves via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
2023-06-19 18:55 ` kiasoc5
2023-06-20 10:45 ` W. T. Meyer
@ 2023-08-19 12:11 ` Simon Tournier
2 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Simon Tournier @ 2023-08-19 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicolas Graves, guix-devel
Hi,
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 14:54, Nicolas Graves via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." <guix-devel@gnu.org> wrote:
> One of the criticism that can be read online about Guix (compared to
> Nix) is its speed. I have never tried Nix and probably won't in a near
> future, but I was wondering if some work has been made to compare them
> on basic tasks (package installation, removal...) (the reason why I ask
> is to be able to give an honest answer to someone hesitating between
> both).
I would find that very helpful. For some command, I find Guix very
slow, especially when compared with Apt or Aptitude from Debian. But
that is comparing Apple to Orange. :-)
For sure, “guix search” is very slow [1].
1: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/39258
Cheers,
simon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-08-19 14:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-06-19 12:54 Guix / Nix Benchmarks Nicolas Graves via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
2023-06-19 18:55 ` kiasoc5
2023-06-20 5:24 ` Csepp
2023-06-20 9:14 ` Efraim Flashner
2023-06-20 10:45 ` W. T. Meyer
2023-06-20 14:48 ` Nicolas Graves via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
2023-07-02 20:30 ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-07-02 21:42 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2023-07-02 22:02 ` Wilko Meyer
2023-07-03 6:17 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2023-08-19 12:11 ` Simon Tournier
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).