From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6PvCOpHXBGP0NQEAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 15:35:14 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id cGZ2OpHXBGOwOgEAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 15:35:13 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A76E2F041 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 15:35:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54736 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQU3k-00016k-Ro for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 09:35:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51494) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQU2q-00014u-Vw for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 09:34:18 -0400 Received: from mout-p-102.mailbox.org ([2001:67c:2050:0:465::102]:59618) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQU2o-0007ko-MT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 09:34:16 -0400 Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (smtp2.mailbox.org [10.196.197.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-102.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MBqvK6GKQz9t22; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 15:34:05 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6xq.net; s=MBO0001; t=1661261645; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=s/v5AdFw2VRjGC/49Z92UCPvxvciSUZtCkEEKjaNUBY=; b=Xm+8tqYPllC+0zqHXhb/mcSYvZSSD9a227ba9/VH5lY1aoVjAAnucv1YgT3EnIeONM0zVD 3dAev9HEOrzmIcezkIwVqLqSxkf82G8qfM9Sa+a/mkL3ogdQGG2mzq8PgveIpP84VPYx9b tXLB1xcp8+LtdccpuFOynKSj3kVHNAqTXzKxsEqrFbnBFjG675SWLOv34Wa8qZsFFgwXg8 RfFqYYS1MijU6MbXfN+n7D3+zE9E+cgh8lLAc5+gCP78YzGTHuds+wSaryYlZQu/pai0mZ l0fUS9gKM5z6z1DSaKX9/dbnHGRBisBdoLb43ix+dAK7qt8pOEIj0q0hEjtO1g== Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 15:34:03 +0200 From: Lars-Dominik Braun To: zimoun Cc: Guix Devel Subject: Re: Cabal mismatch in ghc-lucid; long-term archiving Haskell? Message-ID: References: <86v8qnxmfh.fsf@gmail.com> <87ilmk5q8q.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87ilmk5q8q.fsf@gmail.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:67c:2050:0:465::102; envelope-from=lars@6xq.net; helo=mout-p-102.mailbox.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1661261713; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=s/v5AdFw2VRjGC/49Z92UCPvxvciSUZtCkEEKjaNUBY=; b=oEMPX0QpS8jku5eONXeO6FTP4yvc2Tj/Rv6RBi37QrNNGoNWx10bdrhPnYHno6LAGqBLEM /kIo09ADovh4C4ewc6x0sg9XEaZ514pVBPhXJbQmhixV5pv+apYXizve04fj8RM7jISuj5 loql9PR01QUcZknqIOf7IvGbcxlsA15ngQhNX2tllVQ0QVE/Ru7bQbw693bgXnyY9WkYF2 u2M1NGbSpWGFVoF0ewjg1B1J29M6INvF6rBNtybJ9LVAUSPZVTU3EwtKFopMoGd+xNc0Px PTIelntpExI1veVcHjF00/mNQzvaDoTxpiQ0spNl9eMtbts9TaO8A7vZDmenOQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1661261713; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=XYMGquTOC7aN5r0ZJIEonLFzmlli8XWlamoY5cn7KoRmrehbt2Cld8WyNJhioQ94q4Rj9E 3k5c03X2REBF2EAosNRLqFvjiJsKas34leYYOg73tJk1MhF2eEp4JbARuX88oUQitMQ/dO IVibpxm5DDt9mWW/tfv2wymO40m6LYDKzDDl9SAhIO2ESAT8wKWuwU8BKkRF6M+Xah7sZv 1At7mqRmDZCcvfxMmIhR4TesdTfuzi7Eo5/LZVd5M5L15ZRuflPsjFdQZKZE/WEmD/udUr lAiqZNlJ7++L8qu9oXlpGEs8zSNpIX+KRJ7z88pmUCc6PBUJq4e4hmsyqCkhUQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=6xq.net header.s=MBO0001 header.b=Xm+8tqYP; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=6xq.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.10 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=6xq.net header.s=MBO0001 header.b=Xm+8tqYP; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=6xq.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: A76E2F041 X-Spam-Score: -5.10 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: HKDBRW64IdBj Hi zimoun, > Maybe it could be better to move the ’cabal-revision’ from the > ’arguments’ field to the ’origin’ field. > Perhaps, we could have a ’cabal-revision’ procedure returning a G-exp > and put it under the ’snippet’ field. > WDYT? it would be awesome to have that functionality and I agree that a “combining” origin putting the .cabal file in the right spot would be ideal. Not sure how to build that though, any ideas? > That’s said, it is a core-updates change because it requires to modify > the Haskell build-system and, a rough estimate about the number of > impacted packages: There’s a branch wip-haskell waiting to be worked on. Lars