From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id MJ+ROl4QAWOMdQEAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 18:48:31 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id gIF4Ol4QAWOUQQEAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 18:48:30 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9DC5BAAE for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 18:48:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39494 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oPRe9-0005QV-Vs for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 12:48:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48390) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oPRdj-0005My-0w for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 12:48:03 -0400 Received: from mout-p-201.mailbox.org ([80.241.56.171]:44142) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oPRdg-00060p-6n for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 12:48:02 -0400 Received: from smtp202.mailbox.org (smtp202.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:b231:465::202]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-201.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4M94LK0KPpz9skh; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 18:47:53 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6xq.net; s=MBO0001; t=1661014073; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gQSdNMBVtpDGeWBChT1DnjDqCxH55wu3a2XYM4l/udY=; b=0J/jzZVOBX/3ZYnLLXs4w0F8WIs2kq00r27tPK+SGCrNKpBH2BE9/74ZnPg+3S9CThepna 9QzwmcHf1fh+/t/ht7Lfk28vIw8c+XRcu5PZSaBCJpSoA2dJddaKpBXxnBFYee/4DUmWxy mK21rvD7w1kwZG2t3Q2BL3V0c9gq2BIlanu8pNlLwcP/iFbduJ5t2xpw1zpNBw6M4ot2y+ Q0eQk0LAk7CBpVSjPXx3zDqVQkATAw8c+4UOM5Fvs4ZTbQpvjj+eVLpv+d/p2FJhSEKczh G0HWBBX3LeA1EMvUXSmxcWEz/xWS6u7Ix66cdDNNav19PRHno+XkWJK/V+HVBg== Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2022 18:47:50 +0200 From: Lars-Dominik Braun To: zimoun Cc: Guix Devel Subject: Re: Cabal mismatch in ghc-lucid; long-term archiving Haskell? Message-ID: References: <86v8qnxmfh.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <86v8qnxmfh.fsf@gmail.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4M94LK0KPpz9skh Received-SPF: pass client-ip=80.241.56.171; envelope-from=lars@6xq.net; helo=mout-p-201.mailbox.org X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1661014110; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=gQSdNMBVtpDGeWBChT1DnjDqCxH55wu3a2XYM4l/udY=; b=CRclzTQs/0XgJyK8ZUKtV/eS5UDCtnV50vQkQD9Ez/20UgGonVRhnVmrfre2a5mCo3Yqim fxa3PRiuh88OswI2BaRfEXRvTDPgTc3XwbxQScpzuEQ8mp/G9AHYnFtbLBOK7Y2BO+UVcH 2gdhdxneYnP7BXMTMoaD1OTFzzRvGTMYsd0mGATfhvnyT73B79Odrt5rWgkFdF7K6FODCa DkxUCL67EJzlQ6D7+HLTFdeM6Yimo6/BBPp+BWRiU2L07aVNnYqCjCXZsazRO5sMN6sS7j CHWES/g4Jd8s+k+9mICjH/nSff20aaEWU+BhNsOM7gfVrp8o1ZM6fiJjZnMKYQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1661014110; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=aW+eFMv1n1V0QJmEVhUtvtn1wo6tllABTtSTQhWxvKZTF0V98MO2H4yA+HDU3UKr6pIN++ ZNvcvOKPuhpzjBTy37UzXjo6Z7RcPxckOOIvaLCNOFeP6w/y3PFydNpWJGnTH14ynAbjso MZ97AgrYmhU3wpbZ2cg7s6AoRV8s3gc4RSCjRfQOQLFiXYfiWUtL5uyieNpnubMc6Jcido gfv2kqT4Op6ueQ94ehBJLJMR+bT3XwD7lfW23Kw8/Gl8AGhrGVICmgNrEWS0LUpbdtDT/h M7fNlw7+GGd9eQ/EuUylHZgQ1fOhcAlbAZkP03SNf920CruMV7swPNyobzGR/Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=6xq.net header.s=MBO0001 header.b="0J/jzZVO"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=6xq.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.45 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=6xq.net header.s=MBO0001 header.b="0J/jzZVO"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=6xq.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: B9DC5BAAE X-Spam-Score: -4.45 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: 7WxUDyuHa39E Hi zimoun, > Is it a manual in-place replacement? Or is it an automatic in-place > update by Hackage infrastructure? Or do I miss a point? > > In all cases, these revised Cabal files are not archived elsewhere than > in Hackage, right? The question is thus, where could we archive them? > > Note that the both items have the same store-address hash > (/gnu/store/rj33x41i86vgw6c0iwffzwrgzrib1shb-ghc-lucid-2.9.12.1-1.cabal) > but not the same content hash. fear not, this is a mistake on our side – mine in particular. `git blame` indicates the package was updated in my last big Haskell bump as commit b97f549b14402421fcfb360ddd4cff7de93b9af0. And while I updated the version number, I did not touch #:cabal-revision, which is obviously a mistake. Unfortunately we chose to encode this information into arguments and not the version and so this happens (alot), because – alas – `guix refresh` touches the version only, but not #:cabal-revision. As for Haskell/Hackage/Stackage: All of their .cabal files are versioned and never overwritten. I think they also keep them permanently. Cheers, Lars