From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id AM91BvpTMmGDbwEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 18:57:30 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id WEIsAvpTMmHcPwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 16:57:30 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 951916C2 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 18:57:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:60324 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMCVM-0005ld-Ly for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 12:57:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42582) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMCV9-0005lG-8T for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 12:57:15 -0400 Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]:45709) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMCV6-0001Xm-F5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 12:57:15 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A2B32009A9; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 12:57:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 03 Sep 2021 12:57:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=a/gK6Q+cTmkoTOU5ofcfI19R o+HtHOSTExshx/ljZZ8=; b=19TxRwU+GSYv5W+RG4KIgNWiQO0Vg7S/kJmXHhx5 Eql3AEWopE+s758WRPA13lc9yaDs/TcxLBh7t36VY/ED/AEqg0HD0Yi1tvkFXO9G nFTT6jWDwfcMqoKp9aPA6SymjfueHEmw5HyLRKVCqcCuvCuu+l8Nix12oZvas0U9 aOE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=a/gK6Q +cTmkoTOU5ofcfI19Ro+HtHOSTExshx/ljZZ8=; b=EpjCTPa/MlsE1AUF8i/Z8/ gfHyRx4sUrESxnOgsNOW3xnnjjVgpobEG/onMGfBxFf7y1r/kZo3txZ51Eu7URb/ 51kKpA8Ug1BodUrupv0GHhcKZAzQSa1iu7XIx3wmPnwKrbBWdo5nNMHcfudu6W7H FTdDclQiRmyOAlDS4HkhiP3l0vTy3HPH9WtSFHTcLuuI+e7niiYK3P6/LmaN7Epl vCZ7WIciqUwQcngxLzo/APq/vj8L6KCX5JuREUA5xlNt0PwvJwfv7oDYygDk26Vd Xu3fpjc1A9b8FKm/DXvMiWoC05QQAKFok72tn0RRKTutFUsJrmLQ1IcoIcZcbmeg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddruddvjedguddthecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcu hfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepueekkedtffdvtddugeejgedtvefhueefiedvjeeitdeigedtveejvdejheff vefgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplh gvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 12:57:06 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 12:57:04 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: Xinglu Chen Subject: Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages? Message-ID: References: <8635qp1j6k.fsf@mgsn.dev> <87bl5clg3p.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> <2def863d-fd2e-46c3-9a4c-9c6772724d27@www.fastmail.com> <87fsuojl43.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> <87o899iqpp.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.25; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Christopher Baines via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." , Sarah Morgensen Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1630688249; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=a/gK6Q+cTmkoTOU5ofcfI19Ro+HtHOSTExshx/ljZZ8=; b=MQaGHCUhLJlWd9cmRfxD8WmJ5vcL4wyiZGXAeKKeGA78w7vdxX7lJqlVqoHUzvvVXxehsp xKjPftGNLuAnIYc1kaqbzKLeukgBRWoXU8zErw7Fq77NGl22TsWSH188orgqubyAfsMTNG sWsTmAN7EdOo2w259jpMm+ZcR/POajvmMmw2qvBc+xJDPX16l/zmgyuoEPtkzfn1VaHf+f WQBFMS5U0n1CHwmDbiHL1pqVtkzpK5xhfjAzn1xc6DZP4xR7N2AFZVCMK0bZg0UycW7dgH TXwxNqNeNPnVnEdLUisZ0vtNej1DXpQAl5GlN+qGEsp0zGnjw+OwB+gxC3eIOw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1630688249; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=s3wzMM9t4rC12CfffwIWlAsLhQptyLnL7DPh2/DB0Tg0fqpW2MM4JOitcMwuK4o3OHrCRl So1w5MVuv82c19KH2bzb8IXjIW3BPLZPDufmEk4IFfZPQoBUSyqGKGjkacHoGMqpMh/VTK zqBBlQduqUOu1sevpjyomVfgRqeRfbRbA4BTZXO78PlQAneEifN1VXvmoRB55I/oc3AYsA 9NkdhTFly/MsXjc6+jEVf9L8iBTxLVP/9pGcFeMlp2CmAfLEVt2CCCsB2I0TqxqZviTNgg R1WoDLuCNro9wpO8hE5f2eTaZjLyGig14lf79vVNKCYCEICP3JtSbHfNnxwrfQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=19TxRwU+; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b="EpjCTPa/"; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.62 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=19TxRwU+; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b="EpjCTPa/"; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 951916C2 X-Spam-Score: -1.62 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: vM8IaMy4qACX On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 12:35:21PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > 1) To know how old the package's source code is Oh, some more thoughts: What about extending `guix refresh` to help with your use case, assuming that it doesn't already? And what about packages that aren't based on VCS, but on tarballs / zip files? Do those need a timestamp too?