From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id dCteCaDXEGEMSQAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 09:22:08 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id +GdGBKDXEGG4KQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 07:22:08 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C7C71D5A4 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 09:22:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:36666 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mCzbq-0003hk-AO for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 03:22:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33868) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mCzbh-0003hc-4E for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 03:21:57 -0400 Received: from mout-p-201.mailbox.org ([2001:67c:2050::465:201]:59330) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mCzbe-00063n-Bx for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 03:21:56 -0400 Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (smtp2.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:105:465:1:2:0]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-201.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GjnZh4gc2zQkBv; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 09:21:48 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6xq.net; s=MBO0001; t=1628493707; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vF9gc4mi9A+oT4DA14CBbEqpCr9+nFQ9dRwo7ftDa6s=; b=YB1odYCMNFigmCcufmRsXDCbflHZpltiMA9RbRRBrcy6TUeHq+gJunDkFxkaIAxDj/NlNJ g/evF1jP25n4nMr5adlCFy8UsR+IyoXdgOBfqaCEvF+1SBfVxBYE0d8JFIFnHM1GFjNwt/ Hi5ab90qwHNaOw4EX3q9IKWEBRON/Eoond5uOFkKo9/SLSntndYmxVPAq3Jy+x9Bf3PumT cBr38kfJdqTYY9rzip3shFH3paaG/c2Y9Q1zers0vHuF/rtGxk97Ha9ej9va0pL0kJ10D2 od67AsqwHcPRQBxXCBEVVUv0mtqxCfVp20EQQSGsJybtdD7X1P/mWgffM7gKJg== Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.241]) by spamfilter03.heinlein-hosting.de (spamfilter03.heinlein-hosting.de [80.241.56.117]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id nPqtlVdb7qj7; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 09:21:45 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 09:21:44 +0200 From: Lars-Dominik Braun To: Christopher Baines Subject: Re: #f as a package description, gnu: Add rocminfo. Message-ID: References: <20210808145723.7941.35341@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210808145729.2F8D620BD3@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87wnovismp.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87wnovismp.fsf@cbaines.net> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: C7B731859 X-Rspamd-UID: 28ef76 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:67c:2050::465:201; envelope-from=lars@6xq.net; helo=mout-p-201.mailbox.org X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1628493727; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=vF9gc4mi9A+oT4DA14CBbEqpCr9+nFQ9dRwo7ftDa6s=; b=L0AKs93UfeCMFMstVDhPDZX5E3yNV3CImXiuahVk69i2wlbPlpKlxQ+QDn80g6SeSB51cc PP4BEz3VbUnJv1jRce0Jru5HH7Ib+R1TT1ckC59CEYC4p4Oy0jkEZprpWb+7UZ1e+NhYEv zQr56/kU6O++8QfEbAA3EtuRWS4XWTe7fn7u5jdbYans7zUBfFDHe7DrbORK5BckSv6vDY z5csZvUyK5DnYTkTgrEOauFfCdb0yfrVh917UYtgNUASNfez5hQBSQGKVuv9BdixoJmhIY 4Wiy8t+blm1MzORtoIGRDj7mqt16asEw/x/XSqUOOcOeDDfY3UUnZNw9GvZHFQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1628493727; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=JsIyvJeZhKjR24rqcOzt7difN5BJ8+mWCfdlR/2uX7qPhiXpzZ9XJ6wCsk0fYiiggg3MHF PZY1Bn7xCNTEPiDNS98cqtsILT3DxhrbriGTp05usisx05uD681MOLCeAq0uzxRNOepZcH H4WzePvsom21zkPS+VV3NlnlcF2ipaN/o4Qk4qD5o+LqFAyvMZAwpazghcEiKJ20KfciFv K6/nOo+ADClygmw2rvx93ClQKQy7onSQoqpzT8m+hX44GaVk59NVv9kX4vhQzj5SbCbjzP mWiymPv1Az9yCgEj+3ijFr5sw5wX6HVxiPDlgUF+cfFy7DETULo1q98JecfBrA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=6xq.net header.s=MBO0001 header.b=YB1odYCM; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.11 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=6xq.net header.s=MBO0001 header.b=YB1odYCM; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=6xq.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 3C7C71D5A4 X-Spam-Score: -3.11 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: dkXTrse2309h Hi Christopher, > Anyway, I wouldn't like for this change to lower the standard though, > it's currently the only package in Guix with an invalid description (as > far as I'm aware), is there some reason why it doesn't have one? it simply fell through the cracks[1]. Commit 0a379de3249d5e9ff66fb404f7e5aa8ce2cb3d24 adds a proper descripton. Sorry for the trouble, Lars [1] Unfortunately I cannot run `guix lint` on an entire git changeset, so instead I have to check each package by hand and I probably missed rocminfo. I wish someday we can have a branch/pull-request-based workflow with automated CI checks (linting, `guix pull`, signature verification, …) *before* merging to master.