From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id UwMIA3HCgWDsswAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:37:37 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id qQcdOXDCgWCfdwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:37:36 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C018C178FB for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:37:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:41864 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZeCl-0001Yq-Mp for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:37:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40350) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZeCY-0001VN-9D for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:37:22 -0400 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]:57845) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZeCV-0003Zz-VV for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:37:22 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A2616C1; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:37:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:37:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=vGrqR8CQq1SFdprJjDNMhdV/um2G3h0K8U8zbaSSdy0=; b=qcqR6q5M4qm0 PbxhS7A5Nqm/EvYgDcqgRqb3hVZurSD/i9Qvrvm3dqFHKytIa13OgtkCfOBcsWI9 UJXeix2Kr64iaDykKNduAnXvcVqfgs75EGe2fPzfkEHDkcxR9bbFVs8eMmoWoEmn gJ6ghTmos2ZIuxQbNjIIwAa+Q5k6v6g= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=vGrqR8CQq1SFdprJjDNMhdV/um2G3h0K8U8zbaSSd y0=; b=TnPzdXn1zuUNLQEGz7noMieFgUQ4FFzomxD4eHLs0JksuPctZXcwwN7Al MJV+9G3lLP+lgaqnjYKpu/OJAodQmyfoujN+uTbDNDq1ehZDx2wH5S8ngsW7BsMg QItkv0vzMWoUgmuO+9Z+5cVBi3FuCrVS2qPQRupN22vft+xFJeE0yFB5aLr9kF3R 2AR3cFAtppsMeJ9o7JLCMiFNtrnp3y5HGFixBUp9aG07W81n+O20PXfc/eVSgZCW G/++Mrc89jbEz55AYyMrQCv5bMAEFvZOLLf931lr2SlpC6Iz1Cz7RZ1NkqD+bCcM Nj0tn3cKJYzxRf7VEia8Ucgrosd0w== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvddutddguddviecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggugfgjsehtkeertddttddunecuhfhrohhmpefnvgho ucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeegieelteeuuedujeehfefhtddugfeffeehuedtueevfefhhffffffgveei leduhfenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhdrohhrghenucfkphepuddttddruddurdduieelrd duudeknecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep lhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (pool-100-11-169-118.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [100.11.169.118]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DB51924005C; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:37:14 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:37:12 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: Raghav Gururajan Subject: Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes Message-ID: References: <87tunz11mf.fsf@netris.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.24; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel , Leo Prikler Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.00 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; none X-Migadu-Queue-Id: C018C178FB X-Spam-Score: -4.00 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: sn+YGNFI2acf On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:05:36AM -0400, Raghav Gururajan wrote: > Okay, I was able to retrace. When Leo and I were working outside savannah, > there was master --> core-updates merge. Leo made these changes when he > committed to his repo > (https://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2021-03-26.log#000811), from which I pulled > then format-patched and sent it to guix-patches > (https://issues.guix.gnu.org/42958#64). From guix-patches it was then pushed > to core-updates (https://issues.guix.gnu.org/42958#67), from where I > cherry-picked into wip-gnome. Mark, Do you know if the security fixes under discussion are necessary on core-updates? Raghav and Léo, is wip-gnome based on core-updates?