From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id NXA0OhvVXGAJWgAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 19:23:23 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id KBDUNBvVXGCVAwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 18:23:23 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7060C15EC1 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 19:23:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:47214 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lPUde-0005p0-HT for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:23:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40548) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lPUZu-0003nE-7n for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:19:31 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:39197) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lPUZp-0002PO-NJ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:19:30 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E6A5C014B; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:19:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:19:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=If+XhK4yprsGacdJ/nGkBzOD 3TubU8UO5KcXUV6skww=; b=G0WnbLAy6m7IveZRR4IUC0aHXnwwzxhhtSOYh5/M kYv4rRWqC1JG5faEvzq1im3WlRdBE70HhHgZ529NXh+Q+IWpnEs60XhkR3/dP2BE XTb5yM7ALz9GVlhmTCvyR1NaTMCxG+utFvrMO/oDm5PFPPLky0BbPqJiBUKvDv+i Tk4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=If+XhK 4yprsGacdJ/nGkBzOD3TubU8UO5KcXUV6skww=; b=SDnt9B4VKqLUP91Bo6NW24 RKgw34GOHaDaty2l3YKd6oge3t1iuyXITIHLwnk9Jokj8m1TYlg5izuUHy9ihjqd cOMB3AOjz/e2wbVhVifTWGs2NIbG6LUWlzLrZ4KolpH6I0SI3wGJ2WRSFJfRiIJh yYaw+OvVadFgGDFIrxJPdz/4/mO8wObEfuvl0nis48D3VsnvbjC4NK/VyrRHpNuM VcSIpGeXEKUfZG1lA3OE2pTCajWKwpY85NKDrJL2w97VTVgybogsKWZBjVnHbzf2 fxflu/4oiplkwsXCeHCWRqfFIFcrPXDe7qnGBccFCXD7yUubaKfkCTFBVssHj0rg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudehtddguddufecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtrodttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcu hfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepgffhjeelveetueevhfehhefhvefggeevtdetteejhfeffedvhfdvtdejjeek udefnecukfhppedutddtrdduuddrudeiledruddukeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpe dtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (pool-100-11-169-118.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [100.11.169.118]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 875B51080057; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:19:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:19:21 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: Mathieu Othacehe Subject: Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching Message-ID: References: <9b9a43a584e2dc70488482fce5931b46abd0e006.camel@zaclys.net> <87v99qit39.fsf@netris.org> <877dm29iog.fsf@gnu.org> <20210322144404.1636b9cf@riseup.net> <875z1hv5tt.fsf@elephly.net> <87o8f7b9ev.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87o8f7b9ev.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.26; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=out2-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1616696603; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=If+XhK4yprsGacdJ/nGkBzOD3TubU8UO5KcXUV6skww=; b=u6OUlfyQyNdtha9uJy00ZONT6ErobBFjUwzrv7mmkNsXJU6bnzL57/Z8NlyTlV51f1eS3A YBoIiiq0oOZvZgTTU5QLaqANqCdbpbcZi2ZVLkMWQJyEa2Ey2qUM2O/dBF16noz4aARBId pKxyWqMCP1MuBFX8drRZDGiZy4WgmL62KBL64zTPK643h0qeqUdfTRidqC7lPK1+QEETdm Pia0P+ZIYaAymh+u2unWvM8ka49+iEbrq0pLupSSTlkBcRrpyBvdqFUiHfiWU1Klk104Ps xxc62cHwH68lFs3Mw1+AspIbBoPcve6MMsg8EX3sNcaV7vajn3ebbMiEXNRnNQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1616696603; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=mSYzYqxrhFpRFaiWOIvYzFebXeVDDaclNx6UWMr3fFAklOGBUgzVHejGHBkk+beiz8MGxL yZBmw3n+PatoXarGXLzROeFMnIjZ6/ZrtmujaseVLXRyBOR8qELIl5QD1pYHFuALFb+fj+ X0BvjfZpBE/p/u5g1eeg2ZyWjizBqvITSfjQqHKsFypP++OhY7V/z6Yf+/kA+Q3phRBv9p TOt26OLTJ0fG11zNtpRs+WF0CW2cPWm0Xyls7/XYygG7+JKZzDpAgrdT+XyB4z4WCfbmDL qiObWgkamsjj7aeQaweXmw2Ifs/pE+HYqX4W1Eoc0ttLc6JaDwfRDI/060et2A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=G0WnbLAy; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=SDnt9B4V; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.42 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=G0WnbLAy; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=SDnt9B4V; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 7060C15EC1 X-Spam-Score: -1.42 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: D7yCTRclc1od On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 03:22:16PM +0100, Mathieu Othacehe wrote: > I recently added a new metric in Cuirass: "Builds count per machine > during the last day". Turns out the overdrive1 with its two workers > seems to outperform the hydra-guix-X running emulated builds on four > workers. That's good to know, thanks!