From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id GRRILQ1dKGAlewAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 23:13:17 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id MIWuKA1dKGCxKQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 23:13:17 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1402817E91 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 00:13:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:46840 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lB46G-0001bY-7s for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 18:13:16 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33020) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lB464-0001ZQ-Rl for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 18:13:04 -0500 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]:45491) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lB463-0001P4-0U; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 18:13:04 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 928A69EF; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 18:13:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 13 Feb 2021 18:13:00 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=UgzVIjV938cekjyLieN7wmd0 QlGHj+SbiupGDzOiCZU=; b=uoDFJyQ7E6iq2bx6OHp3S4vbZtV/mtRLB+lK2mP2 i+s68bhJtHQ1vJFnfJ6dixKDocAPHgeRnxupgcv5l80p0sBTKwGlW0wkpOwhZy44 0uMKuOw+4EdnkCidiLyn6jyoOOgIbWOtozkAVrA7R+s664bYZMToVCt6dGPARMUk 7I8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=UgzVIj V938cekjyLieN7wmd0QlGHj+SbiupGDzOiCZU=; b=MeIjDc2D/rx2scJhbt6CPa UhGo9tG6YzBxpUkvAVK0BRr7MQJeq8MogbakPigM+1++ME1313ya9XJmixME5r7t mPwSqRREtj/Gw0jBxydhnuM//eWl6E+qcro12SBGStf8Obx6T7dQWMQM2ahhAkj+ iEEMlzPEyp93+1eXWtUKLLl3EcZMdKfEaSeu1z7y/WcsQZCqEGJcgQYpOuTG2zPU 1yZLiYJnwEZhRbcxLdIJcUcYecQ67x73ajuiVkh0K2Bdi+QuDmMaqRnKZQb+/Hfy cHMlbLAl8DrBcVY1uyHhVI5ud4gr1rUdQbgBX22UWh6OdOFuB3c/b37s6A6IuqcQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrieeggddthecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgr mhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepvddvudegffefiedttdfhfedvuefhgfekieekgeekveetgefhfeetgfegueduffei necuffhomhgrihhnpehgnhhurdhorhhgnecukfhppedutddtrdduuddrudeiledrudduke enucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvgho sehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (pool-100-11-169-118.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [100.11.169.118]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9F6201080059; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 18:12:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 18:12:57 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Mathieu Othacehe Subject: Re: Guix Day: Notes from the CI session Message-ID: References: <87ft26xzci.fsf@inria.fr> <87blcr3l1v.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87blcr3l1v.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.24; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.36 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=uoDFJyQ7; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=MeIjDc2D; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 1402817E91 X-Spam-Score: -1.36 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: iNVrU0juGiVU On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 06:11:08PM +0100, Mathieu Othacehe wrote: > Thanks to Ricardo support I was able to setup a Wireguard tunnel between > berlin and the overdrive1. It seems to work pretty well and > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/workers shows that it is building some packages. I noticed that the number of "slots" on overdrive1 was reduced to 1, at least according to ci.guix.gnu.org/workers I would have guessed that a single slot is appropriate for the machine, but I'm curious what you saw that led to the change?