From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id QImPAevCJmAffQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 18:03:23 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id qPPfOOrCJmAMZgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 18:03:22 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 159D12A81E for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 19:03:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39710 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAcmn-0000lL-3q for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 13:03:21 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55806) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAckk-0007xf-9p for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 13:01:14 -0500 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:43639) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAckg-00059n-PO for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 13:01:14 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EDB85C01AF; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 13:01:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 13:01:07 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=vMAx3IEQnut4/1w5k3OjVLQdR6fTdgmpL607Gy6tlVs=; b=C4KFHhtd9wg2 WT9x3ihtqnRvG4UVWwiqVzieI4dNH2UVwRxLpFnGKYY3vGCTKErfE3I/9Q7mKnd9 SxA5I1VQYs7jN/uL6haFoLuPEQjmIYz1dmFm7JKzlm0ie/q9Bpr32TT9sAWTV8n5 Poxycz1xPdacXUFMkIZdELjSQYGiXaM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=vMAx3IEQnut4/1w5k3OjVLQdR6fTdgmpL607Gy6tl Vs=; b=ed/QaqtqPNA9UlL2MV6bQXh2msvp21QiEclbvvScR6otXT9qLkWHbXJuv YDaJ+YOIn9PIftcOY7HNBq2RQQkXnaUfSzV1zsv8jWDZJmTA1Hs6GBFZeALyzzG6 gbesBeSq//UBDcIPCRD7YYPJgevBL4TJwIBGQImmJyeGE0acMp2VTDQ+wFuELfF7 1CiULr7+691vY95UY3eMKvkCqpfs+jxuRvFZRIENPMQLjaDExkebdhohejHSFvs8 Ljm5Jlcj6gDZ/oQ2pvwZxfMyG2NobOAIhAKub/r+tD3wPsml+QRT7uhb3DO1QhPk 35OZCpu0vMTYkeac6HwzZQUfaFKnQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledriedugdduuddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggugfgjsehtqh ertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhl rghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeefjeevgfeujeefleekhfeitdejhf evvdfgkeekfedutdefjedvhfefledtfeegudenucfkphepuddttddruddurdduieelrddu udeknecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplh gvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (pool-100-11-169-118.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [100.11.169.118]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E4C95240057; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 13:01:06 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 13:01:04 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: Changes to the branching workflow Message-ID: References: <87im6xd17e.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <87im6xd17e.fsf@nckx> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.25; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=out1-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.06 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=C4KFHhtd; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b="ed/Qaqtq"; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 159D12A81E X-Spam-Score: -1.06 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: GeVHk9YkXvzN On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 11:34:13AM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > Leo Famulari =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > During those periods, new patches can be pushed to "core-updates-next" > > and "staging-next". >=20 > I suggest just =E2=80=98branching=E2=80=99 staging & core-updates to a -f= rozen snapshot and > keeping both staging & core-updates in a state of perpetual summer. I thought that the use of -frozen and -next might help avoid mistakes during the active part of the cycles. If someone wasn't aware of the branch status, the lack of a 'core-updates' branch might make them think twice and ask for advice.