From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id iIoWO0WeJWBwPAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 21:14:45 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id gwbTNkWeJWD9GQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 21:14:45 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 826DF9403D5 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 21:14:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:51462 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAJIS-0006qi-AQ for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 16:14:44 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48780) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAJII-0006qK-Cq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 16:14:34 -0500 Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.19]:58835) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAJIG-0002L9-TZ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 16:14:34 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A6FA3C; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 16:14:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 16:14:31 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=Uv/resh0SKKZSol/h17lNEaOBIUn7wNrb9YfnhCdvPg=; b=z8HH6u7vW28m i4vLrwyewarTfxuu3Rb4qVll7DNyBUalcld8Y/HO09D2ohDKOtxPt36PU5sAWuSp cUA5lYZuqHvcGo+1RG3ArWI1zGut1/yZtDMyVLBiwoPmzuDJXD29BZ9ofhTi74pa SgM/cOdwSeM+gz7ydAG1DvvFjOt+dsA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Uv/resh0SKKZSol/h17lNEaOBIUn7wNrb9YfnhCdv Pg=; b=njUte9xk9BXbgCZ0i+ZWXo840N/LjSaP1otaIJwDBfQRLRIcZoiyj8ggl qM6sm6l/nPI804TI5y2aevSY1V6tLMZT9c2RIXnvUGhgfg50nuxVKxT26QFFtdtI 09sp9zFjP38hr3MwESewSFawAv2fJDeW38W/xOwmSehja78PWgRrR0zkPyAHimsK EBHgkWgYO7RoE5SBRgEYTzBeFt4InQza6iiNrk5D6kNr9qBslr5P6yPjTHa8d83b XRqQ900b3pwJGmINcbhFq8iRYqMmnxtpC8L2eimaYS244xcpHJVDscUTPOxt+aNt EfPRdXdcR11bRzwEPMlwEy+xGyUzw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrheelgddugeeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtugfgjgesthekredttddtudenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcu hfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepueeugedugfdvgfevuedvleduleefjefhgefgjeetgfegkedukefhvdefleej hefgnecukfhppedutddtrdduuddrudeiledruddukeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpe dtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (pool-100-11-169-118.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [100.11.169.118]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7FF0B24005A; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 16:14:29 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 16:14:24 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Subject: Re: branch naming conventions [was Re: Guix Day: Notes from the CI session] Message-ID: References: <87ft26xzci.fsf@inria.fr> <87r1ln386n.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87r1ln386n.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.19; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.36 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=z8HH6u7v; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=njUte9xk; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 826DF9403D5 X-Spam-Score: -1.36 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: eLB2Ga2/Mp3P On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:49:04PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Leo Famulari skribis: > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 04:09:15PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: > >> My concern about that is that it basically swaps what we have now. Using > >> -frozen makes it a bit clearer that we're building it out. > > > > Good idea, I like it. > > +1 > > Would someone be willing to add a couple of lines about this in the > manual, next to the place where branching is mentioned? Done in commit 175bea0ca42dba3e02109820efae0cac2804e73b