From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id IGLAFzgeJGD7SwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:56:08 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id eNmfEzgeJGCcIgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:56:08 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8ADE3940439 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:56:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:38300 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9tig-0006oL-BJ for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 12:56:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53572) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9tH0-0005wr-7A for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 12:27:30 -0500 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:52725) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9tGy-0004K6-KV; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 12:27:29 -0500 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE205C013B; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 12:27:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 10 Feb 2021 12:27:27 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=1Sf2xzchAWzuhRw1YzOe9+RV 2DT/ZZbaJLltFOpMjfo=; b=VF64VsimLtmjneIt6XXyLh8RO26AWrGuy2jYxcxj JUo+vbB6TOaXpZ9j68fhvOgxHa+LRzDFwOpLgfzsVefi69YdcbNPp8I0U2XprTRU 6Q8ZQVuv5uhYVM75rImDBp15YQFWW1gLi5VmkrPWalIswQVACCdYj00rZpM6AmMh SiQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=1Sf2xz chAWzuhRw1YzOe9+RV2DT/ZZbaJLltFOpMjfo=; b=vQ96nEaJwj+/8B0vM8sCUw OpbxRFEKH0Rwi3cRvZz+FBcah9EJVPGmpbSumxu7Ep53QKol4xaPC6GT/pwuofDd /pRwd+w3XAk22GJ3aw7ddgJeMObm/gnkZNAxYG3JJNpE5H0MNPSpZD/zXGX6jDZP Ajy8UjqgnSj0KAr65HpUzQ82WEbBKfVTy7Fi78XuvYByXTLQo0qKrwJdZ7wO7s24 +3csJa2TEGBTNcnIFEd4gv5hZrtH8JqOna+LrYQ1+JXO7tzIwfT8hp9v3ou8EPLj x8OJrebFIX/TcEgr+KFvp9Yh33j3xTeWNJ+f8suBU2gI8hQ/wu/vaT4roN8gzV8w == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrheejgdellecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgr mhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepvddvudegffefiedttdfhfedvuefhgfekieekgeekveetgefhfeetgfegueduffei necuffhomhgrihhnpehgnhhurdhorhhgnecukfhppedutddtrdduuddrudeiledrudduke enucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvgho sehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (pool-100-11-169-118.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [100.11.169.118]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 563A4240065; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 12:27:27 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 12:27:25 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Mathieu Othacehe Subject: Re: Guix Day: Notes from the CI session Message-ID: References: <87ft26xzci.fsf@inria.fr> <87blcr3l1v.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87blcr3l1v.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.25; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=out1-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.36 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=VF64Vsim; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=vQ96nEaJ; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 8ADE3940439 X-Spam-Score: -1.36 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: OXiRVlpuFFcY On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 06:11:08PM +0100, Mathieu Othacehe wrote: > Thanks to Ricardo support I was able to setup a Wireguard tunnel between > berlin and the overdrive1. It seems to work pretty well and > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/workers shows that it is building some packages. > > I plan to connect the remaining overdrive machines, 2 at Tobias and 1 at > Andreas places. If this model of connecting build nodes through VPN > works sustainably, connecting more ARM workstations hosted at individual > could be a way to proceed. > > WDYT? I think it's great! Let's get the other Overdrives running, and then re-evaluate their capabilities.