From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 4BCpOGhKHGD1RgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 19:26:32 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id ADgMNGhKHGDKXQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 19:26:32 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0819A9401C0 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 19:26:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:47814 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7kGs-00050j-UA for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 14:26:30 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43980) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7jl7-0007iM-9a for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 13:53:41 -0500 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:36957) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7jl5-0003lb-OU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 13:53:41 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B7F5C00C5; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 13:53:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 04 Feb 2021 13:53:38 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=b6s48UnHKicPPJBEiag6fdgi je3eJS0FHgy75+ljsOM=; b=X8Aq6/jrdGvUbVmQ3mbHCCZ78x9aZaCrJB12tp82 eW0STbUO6l8zACbY7y87e6Qjboj9Q1VqWLGtAHJ/wFw4mjKPwlBSFw/CWUY1dl5y zyOX0ZqsomPTU0GZCqUXY7FaNZ4Ju2lFBIJcf4/cmWvN+pLvFQxKv0opArZ5Iq5n k7M= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=b6s48U nHKicPPJBEiag6fdgije3eJS0FHgy75+ljsOM=; b=rNp1FLWGTK3N1PI4OW6MIG h9EXmVZW1/zJ2ppHOyu3F/9AfBzhMevARshdVDG5UunmJ7ZK2GZ+7LnGZP77CogO s1MVWRxzohMc7mOqE8mNfzj6ikpISrOXZkJpbQVpwAVihsRp2Xl4W5MJMKivbNFw EsU8Tidxm+KCvQeBLOQBEEKNkyqN6f+OLGgf6227YKVsvzRSX+/lNgA4t9iyUOb1 fb3d1EMMXBFrwOlCvXu8Sb5Nz1o2AnU2YADJNDneHY3eShoyYgh38nOpA4HanQsO Ks2+EZhTmcrDzbdkIPz2onJyLHj2krWLM7JyMGSIRlkQzQXe+KNdOV/NMiXPlC8w == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrgeeggdduuddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtderredttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfh rghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpedukeevgeetkeeltefgiedtjefgjeekffduteehvdfhueekudelieekjeefheff teenucfkphepuddttddruddurdduieelrdduudeknecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd enucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (pool-100-11-169-118.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [100.11.169.118]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 91F501080064; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 13:53:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 13:53:37 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Christopher Baines Subject: Re: Branch management, wip-ppc64le, and POWER9 Message-ID: References: <87k0romcrz.fsf@gmail.com> <877dnoyxy4.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="akQ410i0ThEsGjh/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <877dnoyxy4.fsf@cbaines.net> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.29; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=out5-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.96 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b="X8Aq6/jr"; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=rNp1FLWG; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 0819A9401C0 X-Spam-Score: -1.96 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: VlxTuYSw4Wvj --akQ410i0ThEsGjh/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 09:38:43AM +0000, Christopher Baines wrote: > > Specifically, I'm curious to know: > > > > - Is it usually expected that wip branches can be rebased? I don't plan > > to rebase wip-ppc64le, since I'd like to be able to coordinate with > > others using this branch, but I'm not sure what others expect. >=20 > I think rebasing introduces issues with commit signatures, since you'd > then be signing others commits. If multiple people are committing to the > branch, I'd treat it like staging/core-updates, and merge rather than > rebasing. The signatures will be lost, but for "wip-" branches the expectation has always been that history may be rewritten. For me, rebasing is a more comfortable workflow for this kind of exploratory branch. I recommend against using merges here. --akQ410i0ThEsGjh/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAmAcQrEACgkQJkb6MLrK fwgLGxAAnb5AQLEnvnW/THO046FQ7QfwELvg9IEl5cpKXUYmmrdLwWPaRhnu07u3 Lb2qYsUSqTJjWxj726hau87tl7pJOFZ/1jt7MRymRjID3ftcVyleXYhMaG2ibEHQ xr3LAhyEGNww0FuJ342ALq3iR7guzCDmgB+lwjEDh1V8Xr4RvKn9tH2Ldvs8JWHW lfg5HkZxOgXp0VJKPrwpjoG25Yla/I8OnjhlMyILraj8uWNvV+6ZmL23kNOJvuZe Nt6YToh0dM6+H+HZob5ugzjDDFQvPA2xXqP0NcMcPkImiYq70Nk3Zf26UC5KHlgI bttAgoICsmklZoZyr4lhIVC3ICftr92q1naZm7aL2trDrv66g1fWFbMg9ZQAnyiY 2Cn+IoYH4DXj21Ry0GbCuwEbtObdmzfJoN2jxn7CtdJJDZHr8lrIYDftgoDIofDC aYjkDYub0v5suZ5FR7CfTvehaCGHlVTdt6YFdOceUn3hg7tMNeYqi/+LN0JwVXVz 29df3bByENahGk/lCgaTxxl3twW05yxk4d3qWENLowBQ7ncrMccYrqP/D6Rs/lDr +zss6cf5UIntsTSnUOv6usRizTse+2gU2nMq2bHcnjkf28yvm8sMjPaTikM+CkH+ as6H6R0e11W328fGXZIXedIEQk0h1WoC6pEXvpB3gH3vp6PyLp0= =nJ7e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --akQ410i0ThEsGjh/--