From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id uB8SNKvNGWAMJQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 22:09:47 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id cOO4L6vNGWDQLQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 22:09:47 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E0389402BD for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 22:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:41054 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l73rm-00010I-BP for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 17:09:46 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33962) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l73rd-000109-LA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 17:09:37 -0500 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:40375) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l73rW-0005Rj-7a for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 17:09:37 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE26F5C0338; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 17:09:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 02 Feb 2021 17:09:26 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=cvSalhBBtqug+jiVIrjlHvO3 xUUu/Lhl38eJJ4N3RLc=; b=PTkwGDUFb2bxTZiViVL55zIP8GnIEQnoEBZZqgHr 6CLb34muXhm2PUGxuiFqoUmHUlEziZ5z1ZvVgr11ezobtG7K7EWQUqcTN+P0MGvN QwsWlb9btpt57Ejx8J8lKRrjIoQoohrbupeYqKa4gMsaXdY9fHHlCWhWg4pd85I1 PDk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=cvSalh BBtqug+jiVIrjlHvO3xUUu/Lhl38eJJ4N3RLc=; b=fuuDymv3IxE6338FbrIQMQ ImGzH8lm9sZKgEuCCCPhHWL47/FP3agUf8u52W24zgDCLyzcU5TobKGY+YjkMZM/ JG80nzZn09y2DGTgodfyi+SqQFa5lApk5YXRTVcl1332nZpcrucG1IoGMrhcKSvD 3v68kAJ9K/6HUXp23pNhv6BEZSMJN7M/7AVp15pfF70cFYeJWxifR4oYK5X9QDIs q0pc10TV8cE7JpESEupZJWGMttxwcVOmjORr6w+eGoGJ5QKKbSjNXbZCP6c6caPH uzc/5+MQTTZm+lY8G6yPLbZUZU/Exb7RGnPRcTFmKIazbSePb3Afo25Gm3PPYDxw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrgedtgdduheelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfh rghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeeukeektdffvddtudegjeegtdevhfeufeeivdejiedtieegtdevjedvjeehffev gfenucfkphepuddttddruddurdduieelrdduudeknecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd enucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (pool-100-11-169-118.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [100.11.169.118]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 885E7108005C; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 17:09:26 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 17:09:23 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: PowerShell core? Message-ID: References: <38429463-5884-4D4B-BDB4-C70A0FA7A3F8@yasuaki.com> <87k0rqrvv4.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87k0rqrvv4.fsf@nckx> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.25; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=out1-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -0.36 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=PTkwGDUF; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=fuuDymv3; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 5E0389402BD X-Spam-Score: -0.36 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: VJtByRrcIfXP On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 10:41:03PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > Still, we don't boycott malicious upstreams (ungoogled-chromium & worse) and > PowerShell looks like a welcome attempt to pull command interpreters out of > the 70s. > > Due to its (apparent) verbosity it looks better suited to scripting than > interactive use, but then unix shs suck at both so it's still a-- > > --wait, I just described Scheme. Hmm. Heh :) I had the same thought process!