From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id eNnVCuwBE2B5UAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 18:26:52 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id 2BuNBuwBE2BWQAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 18:26:52 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A06D94042F for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 18:26:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:41682 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l5C0I-0006qH-HW for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:26:50 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54780) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l5C08-0006pc-S2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:26:40 -0500 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:39706) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l5C07-0007yF-7E; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:26:40 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [31.210.181.184]) by flashner.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 65D7840148; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 18:26:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 20:25:57 +0200 From: Efraim Flashner To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: Staging branch [substitute availability] Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7jCIcfG+QFri32lZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=178.62.234.194; envelope-from=efraim@flashner.co.il; helo=flashner.co.il X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Mathieu Othacehe Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.95 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 8A06D94042F X-Spam-Score: -3.95 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: IpXyV9FDIXDt --7jCIcfG+QFri32lZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 06:51:13PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 03:46:45PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > > ------ > > master branch > > aarch64: 72%=20 > > x86_64: 94%=20 > > i686: 86% > > armhf: 46% > >=20 > > staging branch > > aarch64: 48%=20 > > x86_64: 79%=20 > > i686: 70% > > armhf: 30% > > ------ >=20 > Updates since the recent merge of master into staging: >=20 > ------ > master branch > aarch64: 72% > x86_64: 94% > i686: 86% > armhf: 46% >=20 > staging branch > aarch64: 51% > x86_64: 73% > i686: 69% > armhf: 27% > ------ >=20 > So, minor improvements to aarch64, but x86_64 is actually worse! > Mathieu, I'm curious, are we using the overdrives again? Or still > emulating aarch64? >=20 > `guix weather` said to me that there are *no* queued builds for x86_64 > on staging, but ci.guix.gnu.org web interface shows that there are > queued builds. >=20 > kwayland is definitely broken on x86_64, so wayland users are invited to > fix it: >=20 This is probably me, I was able to enable and run the kwayland tests on my machine but I think this test only fails when the machine is under load. > ------ > The following tests FAILED:=20 > 26 - kwayland-testPlasmaWindowModel (Failed)=20 > Errors while running CTest=20 > make: *** [Makefile:112: test] Error 8 > ------ >=20 > I've attached the full reports. >=20 > My plan is to wait for feedback for a few days and, if I don't hear > otherwise, then merge the staging branch into master and push. Sounds good! --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --7jCIcfG+QFri32lZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAmATAbUACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1H7VQ//WCD/e87HIOAYw51vbN3iqFG57U7cH319FyxZc5uVz7TA2tSm3smS7R9X g3c18oSzNc73LELmvi7FD746jiVGIlhgatOXQHiKwfrona/e8Z6rF+3MESsTicKD bYt645xlHmJ2G8Bt6dWNRnT/1tK2Hy2kvTMKKqDLJya1ylTlJUb83aPeKCArrmWk Nkb3X+V8zra9TtXwuXNAcKU/NcwmPYoFhMxkJT6qZhR1kKbE30TsOYZqbeukibLy e9vg/xVFiSG5Z1IpwvePD9rB3pwjKuJgsfcvH8uBo1EJHYJgq2De4k9gMLNwd8oB vcKlAZPuxlcmdl63lq6UD5Jz6Zo630LVi8W8q+uCiYsFYHs2+IBNxxVL9W90vDNc FSMuYNQ1Lm8LHg3rYJWbT5huaT9nX1soa7zp5ClPROqM30sd5W/zTtqY/1mMj4OW bNmH2R6UiwDhWbi0jWXEY707/d2p/4ma3cj8+0uB15maKBBURFjSGY8meveAP3Ca /42K/MOKRfkMtNhXnEOSaEheSEdGGRZAiA8LSBvOEqIEYu3LYHJzmi2V+FG2+eZy bYCPoCvEeVanZxopoJCZD8TkLIovOU3YrTE5jdQATYuRZIF36HnUjipQooo4Nzhw Ab+n7OdzKZfpJ+GvP+eepB8kJdFcOLZLtkDsGX+O28h7ZYl2o1g= =kOTT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7jCIcfG+QFri32lZ--