From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id Hg/BC4WZDGADewAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 21:47:49 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id MIv8BoWZDGBvBwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 21:47:49 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6F949403CD for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 21:47:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:52540 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l3Ql1-0006oq-SI for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:47:47 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50038) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l3Qkp-0006nD-Nb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:47:35 -0500 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:41103) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l3Qkn-00016G-F3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:47:35 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id F35015C00D0; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:47:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:47:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=o/TAs2CurulvRR73SyWepFw2 Y7MZ7UQI6FTlQMp6oFY=; b=jDl891mfxeu6rNMmWBAG+gjXb7x3YotKrC+ro1ZI 6IPF0Upx8IEHS9lrh44vIPn+mYO4O/yCCFH4Wowu7v88JTO5ezkf+K5HplpBO35j Jt4wqaL+omz/6HkvX3JpbpCltYNu5SzldhNgIWzK96TH10zeox0Nzlb/dk80R2rs Rpk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=o/TAs2 CurulvRR73SyWepFw2Y7MZ7UQI6FTlQMp6oFY=; b=jxIBT/E8OxP98o681i5io4 A7TJ/uvmojr+w7NT/RqTcGnTeBYzHun6j38OyUJ5YGClZifGhOADojGnYIp80Dy/ +m6xZp9cOC1It5sHuY2R8gC3d8daXpjlQPPjDMay1foohzb2po3k/I1LzvP03S56 AtQ9WePR5a+qhAcyaYOSuBmNclnAjXPSgfnBGp0wvopuSCpjiPI8X+nvOyiStoa9 cW4Y3PmqxyvWdEXo5au5CAXSyPjYz7TLgNnx4vbQvKgYPtq3Mx8suxaZK8drvOvr VP4FeF2C6K165++Y7xUpIWXr5YG5bQlKUNMQJsm9DQRbzz1BL1BqQ+sMIqABKRsg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudekgdduheeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfh rghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpedvvddugefffeeitddthfefvdeuhffgkeeikeegkeevteeghfeftefggeeuudff ieenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhdrohhrghenucfkphepuddttddruddurdduieelrdduud eknecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgv ohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (pool-100-11-169-118.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [100.11.169.118]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9A909108005C; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:47:30 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:47:28 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: Staging branch [problem with node-10.22] Message-ID: References: <84cf2463-9117-cd2f-d00a-41147929b6a6@web.de> <87im7nfij6.fsf@netris.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87im7nfij6.fsf@netris.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.27; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=out3-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.35 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=jDl891mf; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b="jxIBT/E8"; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: E6F949403CD X-Spam-Score: -1.35 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: ocnJauxXO7QZ On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 04:29:54PM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Presumably the problem is that you're using a certain 3rd-party channel > that relies upon the 'node-10.22' variable, which was removed in the > following commit on the 'ungrafting' branch (later merged into > 'staging'): > > https://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?h=staging&id=18f10c0b12dd369507fd2821dcf748fc9b13053a This hypothesis was confirmed on the #guix IRC channel.