On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 11:22:50PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 10:51:59AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis:
> > 
> > > I'm not sure there is a bug report, I didn't see it either. It looks
> > > like when I bumped rust-bootstrap from 1.39 to 1.54 we lost aarch64
> > > support. I've bumped mrustc on staging and successfully performed a
> > > qemu-binfmt build of rust-bootstrap for aarch64 on my x86_64 box. I was
> > > then able to use that to build rust-1.55 on actual aarch64 hardware, so
> > > I assume it's good, I just don't have the hardware to build
> > > rust-bootstrap for aarch64 natively.
> > 
> > So the presumed fix involves bumping rust-bootstrap from 1.54 to 1.55,
> > is that right?
> > 
> > That means we’ll have to rebuild on all architectures.  This is
> > happening here:
> > 
> >   https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/739823
> > 
> > Could you monitor it?  If things go well, can we aim for a merge by next
> > Thursday?
> 
> I think it looks good, but I'm not sure how to compare it to master.
> perhaps some Magic View™ using the guix data service?

I merged master into staging again and took a look at the build
failures. They seemed alright (and I restarted a few) and then merged
staging into master. Everything looks good from cuirass in relation to
the merging.


-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted