From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id eP90J7wa6F+MQAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 05:25:16 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id eEpCI7wa6F+VTAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 05:25:16 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40C669403C5 for ; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 05:25:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:53478 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ktOYM-0002Dp-1X for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 00:25:14 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54862) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ktOY8-0002Ba-WE for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 00:25:01 -0500 Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.20]:36535) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ktOY6-0005Bs-V4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 00:25:00 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD95F560; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 00:24:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 27 Dec 2020 00:24:54 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=ZyZYhx3hcmHeG6aa6LLTB6PJ R2tQ0bZ7KXVwqD/Ie/g=; b=sqbWY8TbXy6HxkTgt17d6sUZzwEQBD5K238kVilH xBZeRUyOiA4rWhRjvKMjWHsQe4vzQqeF4drwyQBg7BTNSK8IBzwTGz6KQxWeBiJG 1AF59nplsPlPKAHUqIOsSr+mFLX1mGcULFO8BgZqFs4T7EYIMZfa/Wsd/zE0T+5x 6Kc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=ZyZYhx 3hcmHeG6aa6LLTB6PJR2tQ0bZ7KXVwqD/Ie/g=; b=qqzC4fxMe4CA4hdrppaFVW OYVgCcT3k8fc6DfH7nrmQtJjqoMGFsZHHy0MW8o3IplOO8Av6TeRZ5t0Pvc1/Fxv xSlMn1CnEiU6et8WQVukGsvkL2VPhepTc4NwpK0uiuEwTXGUvp+04NXNM73Eu8sh qHFI4Yifl57VUSvkSRji+nhvNUiygzc77CqAy391wKr3KoS1O62iP97wpPrP3r3s 9pTF/pD4P/LEKNNaBAP7ey7BPURHewVZTEJiEtTGjxm1QL/kqo0Wnpyzru4Rk4gi 86cIAByirM9lEIHPbviOPwahPOKcZGBgA56gbBgqsCyVMfjDZuxTcVgviqex2NEA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrvdduiedgkeehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtderredttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfh rghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeeijeefkeetvedvheeijeegtdeitdeiueekleetffdtleejhfegvdfhieeuhedv jeenucffohhmrghinhepjhigshgvlhhfrdhorhhgpdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghenucfkph epieeirddvfedvrddvgeehrdduheehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghr rghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (d-66-232-245-155.ct.cpe.atlanticbb.net [66.232.245.155]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6D9D51080064; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 00:24:51 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2020 00:24:49 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: Linux-Libre-LTS Message-ID: References: <877dp7ik5v.fsf@netris.org> <86bbed0c-3b57-f276-81a5-c0f1c1b6858e@web.de> <877dp6ipw3.fsf@netris.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lmEN0dTqaJhLeyOk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <877dp6ipw3.fsf@netris.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.20; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.92 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=sqbWY8Tb; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=qqzC4fxM; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 40C669403C5 X-Spam-Score: -1.92 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: aVOZDTXpYvTr --lmEN0dTqaJhLeyOk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 09:24:17PM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: > What do you think? I understand your concerns about the ambiguous meaning of an "LTS" kernel in the context of Guix. In order to make it more concrete, we could attempt to stay on the same long-term support kernel series between Guix releases. It might not always be possible or convenient, but it could make it more meaningful. If the LTS kernel were to expire before a new Guix release, we would have to decide what to do. We shouldn't start backporting fixes or maintaining our own tree, in any case. Regarding the comment above the new variables, I think that the longterm support kernels are, by definition, "current". If they are not current, then they are not supported. If the variables should point to the newest kernel with longterm support, let's change the comment. Something to note is that, much of the time, Guix *only* offers long-term support kernels. Also, the dates on appear to have drifted out of sync with the upstream at . --lmEN0dTqaJhLeyOk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAl/oGp0ACgkQJkb6MLrK fwi1fxAAvsjvHinwikPVF0rR1ez/j+1qRJ9sHXdSqJXvdoUrMyDhyczq/VnG2qpT txry/spCHzjELpulX5Dxa0skzpoH+6my4Moh5y5NClL/6TfU3ZrXvHnV6Q4dZcl0 g1649WeZ7Rhle+w+3Ce8xB55Ok604jNK8Q0t6OspWYz3ItOqWnuAaQmAt5YaQbrU tAiTs3rUR+Him10HF3kqNjwQbKTDINjyRUTlEqIi1x4yKJqL5D5o7Xjd36wNdjZ3 QTOJ4JmrJ5au5D288jkkxy0P+SG7pC0GNwzTfxx2sivB4h1yHT7XCQB8XmBBWrcy bKoxXJPZUEKVVtPXL64WW7q3DimCmLBedVsCpA0UQDnmzbZEbDLVPIcCv15KHbfS Oj2TMfnOYhPmxlgZfBIGav830q4LBZ5T8zQJAK9ZDY+0JfyYdF+5myv7x6FH0Hlw E8ftJ/iQgsPqhS9yxOEbTbCb2RpvSCnrpn7f981QZ/dbR+UcsCmSKpbnobODTOgO dSvjWRmtc9amou++HwSn3fAj3tt2e5jvw4QH7HX9idMTSRXxkISq6YINkoH9LPmZ l7kK09x/nz/RRY0L4IidhjyNDPtgAl5wFvGEqtVEr30iSTSiazp5G/w3NhHW7L28 jOl4yue+TAe1teLXug5Hoy2XufJlUzFNJT2rvVTcGKChK6l6PtU= =zvXQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lmEN0dTqaJhLeyOk--