From: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
To: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Guile 2.0 in make-bootstrap.scm
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 11:04:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <X/V9KwY4jB/nFalB@3900XT> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zh1mqw10.fsf@gnu.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1356 bytes --]
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi Janneke!
>
> While uploading the powerpc64le-linux tarballs, I noticed they use Guile
> 2.0, which reminded me of eef44fea17a735d2f4048a747d16af478d4b9dbc:
>
> Revert "gnu: guile-static-stripped: Update to 2.2."
>
> As discussed on IRC, keeping bootstrap Guile on 2.0 simplifies adding new
> architectures and removes the need for parameterizing
> gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm.
>
> This reverts commit 2acfe022a740f79b593348cc6362cc4ee8f33bb4.
>
> * gnu/packages/make-bootstrap.scm (%guile-static): Revert to guile-2.0. Retain
> build recipe.
> * gnu/packages/patches/guile-relocatable.patch: Update for Guile 2.0.14.
>
> Do you remember the reason for this change?
>
> What’s surprising is that
> <https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/guix/bootstrap/i686-linux/20190815> does use
> 2.2.
>
That wasn't me? (I apparently touch everything) I remember guile-2.2 for
the bootstrap had (likely) endianness ordering issues with PPC32, and it
was far simpler to revert back to guile-2.0 than to try to fix it.
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-06 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-06 9:01 Guile 2.0 in make-bootstrap.scm Ludovic Courtès
2021-01-06 9:04 ` Efraim Flashner [this message]
2021-01-06 11:01 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2021-01-08 17:14 ` Timothy Sample
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=X/V9KwY4jB/nFalB@3900XT \
--to=efraim@flashner.co.il \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=ludo@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).