From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id oIhvOhK572OiHQEAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 18:27:47 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id 8P18OhK572N/RwAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 18:27:46 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9766BD533 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 18:27:46 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail3 header.b=Nglh23Cx; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=protonmail.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1676654866; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=gEPQiuwOfI/FXIcIL4ZIOH90FOmp1z4+7LxrzRsJqTkneTxBdKO4OTNcOqghE6gW2dKyz4 vjW4BxyJ0Lef/5OQD0ZaC/WwHvhxN1VCE7re35ww6nFxTOXJJHOgagLxPAtBeCwavXrKgh 8ASfjplCxg8ctICl57YiQL8J6kAcJ/6d6XDHhRsqq2TBJ3Hl8DV42tjKXzCTjoeqhD/ZYl 36q9FHhtLiQ/fBRhbf3RgfTNAgiQINgntNuaeqCDfRgbsJq1TAPVZQvkJfD6HGf6hQGPBD dGzBwTAmskdBi10Zvvh+l77wBpozYKfjW+FKInZg2gWI4ao67BI3AWW5cQXepg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail3 header.b=Nglh23Cx; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=protonmail.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1676654866; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=jU3V4VuQ/Hvx3DP6LKMci1A+kkyujFWt4CAm9fXCmo0=; b=SUEpLge9dc5gZAaxpGiultGbmVMlq0rxQbJMkwZu0NoH5zUxcFiMAbPl5vLNIrnFpZqXmU 8pk5nh+8F4FuNKPG1uEYfovdFu1DR4Eq33tJhUkx8SZLn10SOjacIaPgymH/iomVJdtR2I OP91g9eC/fS7kBdX+R6bj2t4PALsz6k2jcVMMqx3BmQOOWD4XUSlpy3yc+AhDsbCXKlDqc usaJKDDV0L/3XmriGY7RHj2CxMXZwQPs7zGlw0a/yprULKzs8AY6p7JEDV33ILz2ish12W WfWKHLkBm0oFuoLggi5ZfV7+n+5cGfqdju0zpJgIFATpgOBRJDlfAUMbmmzDaw== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pT4W5-0005mg-G5; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 12:27:25 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pT4W3-0005mJ-B4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 12:27:23 -0500 Received: from mail-40134.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.134]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pT4W0-0000m0-8j for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 12:27:22 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 17:27:02 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1676654835; x=1676914035; bh=jU3V4VuQ/Hvx3DP6LKMci1A+kkyujFWt4CAm9fXCmo0=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=Nglh23CxMS8MHbnXRzkYPu5ukXq+0mme+BzHFFgSruzWd2Luzq3uCZbAdD9Dy13za cIaCnSsyYI4wsySeXMlr3xe7LhxSzdVXsRm0TsmNHrMELqf2SNB9AHyfHxVy75rLLU dkk4iF/6VeOgfGxzRPXFtPvGRMa6ZFZ2aSpnZ/U8C2BiQN4Ek8QyCeAJpTO4X8uLUb q7ml4zgtTpXuUrjZCyywd2h5OgP3wELpDKa+EKM3HnuGoY3qC2hnDohVEyR37KgZUa 7oPmyW3dbiZXN2bUvJAZEMhhkPPiJLm5n1kSx8UvWpoOlmgZFC0Fl3e4Styp2NeJb7 0ghzICgq1Wmaw== To: Andreas Enge From: Kaelyn Cc: Julien Lepiller , guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: Openjdk (was: Merging core-updates?) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <20230212100540.2214f16c@sybil.lepiller.eu> Feedback-ID: 34709329:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.134; envelope-from=kaelyn.alexi@protonmail.com; helo=mail-40134.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 9766BD533 X-Spam-Score: -6.36 X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -6.36 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-TUID: kas9234Sf2Lb Hi, ------- Original Message ------- On Friday, February 17th, 2023 at 4:28 PM, Andreas Enge w= rote: > Am Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 03:49:19PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Enge: >=20 > > Hm, I compiled up to openjdk@13, @14 fails with the message below. > > This is strange. It looks as if the patch that has become obsolete, > > because integrated into the source @13, is needed again @14! > > And then @15, the patch is again already integrated into the source cod= e. > > Very weird! >=20 >=20 > Things become totally crazy. > So far I have compiled @13 without the patch, @14 with the patch, > @15 without the patch, and @16 seems to need it again. Is this an > odd/even thing? Are there spring and autumn versions of openjdk with > different release teams? Hi, I don't know much about openjdk or its development process, but I had one p= ossible thought about the pattern of patch application. Was it a patch that= was applied or backported to existing openjdk releases, and are @14 and @1= 6 the latest releases of those series? At least to me as a naive outside ob= server, the patch being needed for some of the older release branches but n= ot others sounds like a patch applied to multiple existing release branches= , with openjdk@14 and @16 being at older point releases from prior to the p= atch being applied upstream. HTH! (And I apologize for the noise if not!) Cheers, Kaelyn =20 > Well, in @17, @18 and @19 the patch seems to be definitely integrated > into the source code. >=20 > Andreas