From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Woodcroft Subject: Re: Ruby 2.5, pushing to staging? [UNSCANNED] Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2018 03:04:42 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87in2g0zlm.fsf@cbaines.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_ME2PR01MB3249D1B6D8D32389D4C5F392ADE40ME2PR01MB3249ausp_" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40927) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g8cvl-00028M-U5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 23:07:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g8ctp-0001Fs-Uq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 23:05:05 -0400 Received: from au-smtp-delivery-112.mimecast.com ([124.47.189.112]:58075) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g8ctm-0001AP-VN for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 23:05:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87in2g0zlm.fsf@cbaines.net> Content-Language: en-AU List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Christopher Baines , "guix-devel@gnu.org" --_000_ME2PR01MB3249D1B6D8D32389D4C5F392ADE40ME2PR01MB3249ausp_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Chris, Thanks for pushing this forward. When I tried with 2.5.0, timestamps meant = that the build was not reproducible - just wanted to check that you'd consi= dered this - sorry if that is noise. Pushing it to staging is what was done previously. Ta, ben ________________________________ From: Guix-devel on be= half of Christopher Baines Sent: Saturday, 6 October 2018 8:59:17 AM To: guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Ruby 2.5, pushing to staging? [UNSCANNED] Hey, A new minor version of Ruby has been out for a while, and it would be good to get Ruby 2.5 in to Guix. I've put up a patch here [1], and tried it locally. I've pushed some fixes to master to make some packages compatible [2], and while I do get some failures when building the 958 (according to guix refresh -l) dependant packages, I'm unsure how many of these are down to the Ruby upgrade. 1: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D32871 2: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D32870 Anyway, looking at the contributing guide this is possibly too big of a change to push directly to master, so should I push this to the staging branch? Thanks, Chris --_000_ME2PR01MB3249D1B6D8D32389D4C5F392ADE40ME2PR01MB3249ausp_ Content-Type: text/html; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Chris,


Thanks for pushing this forward. = When I tried with 2.5.0, timestamps meant that the build was not reproducib= le - just wanted to check that you'd considered this - sorry if that is noi= se.


Pushing it to staging is what was= done previously.

Ta, ben

From: Guix-devel <guix-d= evel-bounces+b.woodcroft=3Duq.edu.au@gnu.org> on behalf of Christoph= er Baines <mail@cbaines.net>
Sent: Saturday, 6 October 2018 8:59:17 AM
To: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Ruby 2.5, pushing to staging? [UNSCANNED]
 
Hey,

A new minor version of Ruby has been out for a while, and it would be
good to get Ruby 2.5 in to Guix.

I've put up a patch here [1], and tried it locally. I've pushed some
fixes to master to make some packages compatible [2], and while I do get some failures when building the 958 (according to guix refresh -l)
dependant packages, I'm unsure how many of these are down to the Ruby
upgrade.

1: https:= //debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D32871
2: https:= //debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D32870

Anyway, looking at the contributing guide this is possibly too big of a
change to push directly to master, so should I push this to the staging
branch?

Thanks,

Chris
--_000_ME2PR01MB3249D1B6D8D32389D4C5F392ADE40ME2PR01MB3249ausp_--