From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Subject: Re: Software Heritage & Guix Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 08:27:39 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <87wokh8y4p.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_30444_456052089.1554013659747" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41989) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hATwW-0001Dn-6v for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Mar 2019 02:27:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hATwU-0000de-SC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Mar 2019 02:27:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87wokh8y4p.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Guix-devel ------=_Part_30444_456052089.1554013659747 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello! Looks like reproducible builds are like videos on video hosting. You= may share your screencast or videos, the others can see your screen exactl= y. But there are limitations: you need to have an account on exactly one vi= deo hosting. There were challenges in Ludovic Court=C3=A8s article. Release= s tarballs are not the same as version control revisions: tarballs may have= `configure` scripts and developers signatures. What to choose for using in= certain reproducible build? There is in need a help from FSF for definition of standards. What do you t= hink? Mar 29, 2019, 4:05 PM by ludo@gnu.org: > Hello! > > I=E2=80=99ve written a post on the Software Heritage support in Guix: > > > https://gnu.org/s/guix/blog/2019/connecting-reproducible-deployment-to= -a-long-term-source-code-archive > > Happy reading! :-) > > Ludo=E2=80=99. > ------=_Part_30444_456052089.1554013659747 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello! Looks like reproducible buil= ds are like videos on video hosting. You may share your screencast or video= s, the others can see your screen exactly. But there are limitations: you n= eed to have an account on exactly one video hosting. There were challenges = in Ludovic Court=C3=A8s article. Releases tarballs are not the same as vers= ion control revisions: tarballs may have `configure` scripts and developers= signatures. What to choose for using in certain reproducible build?

There is in need a help from FSF for definition of standa= rds. What do you think?

Mar 29, 2019, 4:05 PM by ludo@gnu.org:
Hello!

I=E2=80=99ve written a post on the Softwa= re Heritage support in Guix:

Happy reading! :-)

Ludo=E2=80=99.

------=_Part_30444_456052089.1554013659747--