From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id WNsyMlmitl//HAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 16:50:33 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id KDOQLVmitl/BZAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 16:50:33 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 664A09404E0 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 16:50:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:58326 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfn8i-0005Ra-6e for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 11:50:32 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59690) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfn4r-0000rP-7X for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 11:46:34 -0500 Received: from lepiller.eu ([2a00:5884:8208::1]:41618) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfn4n-0000Sy-4V; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 11:46:32 -0500 Received: from lepiller.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 06602ce3; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 16:46:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=lepiller.eu; h=date :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:to:cc:from:message-id; s= dkim; bh=dcIxy5JUBUwgoC21U4i96Pm0ctLI8W7MR3Ulbrka584=; b=d47beVI /7Q6me5GL1dxAkn3lYuv2pT3G/s2QCC7L2PTqsIkMV/3ExiJaweROya8L+U6Pz1B cTj99b6xloFxsj1x33sYnc4e9iH4QhWkiVV1Qsn5vlp7tts9pP+gtezn8uTKRI/9 /hVvchRh7u2NIeb4BYHVeOl0HAM7r+20EbfjjAi6XM24VzUZBmIgdRf0X2cofRrA 5Je+CXOj2Vbc06odo85vkl6hcDbcKWHmx8lfP5kDyT/08w3ByUyNzRWn+lgu4tKc 8e4+p8M+OHh5G8yQm1H5YoEBkXunxpxeeA0A1qFfQxWKlMaPPDrFXDnjV7c2QzpG OYeCKOFwmpuUeng== Received: by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id dc070452 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Thu, 19 Nov 2020 16:46:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 11:46:05 -0500 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: <20201119135634.GE2306@E5400> <20201119141832.GF2306@E5400> <20201119143212.GG2306@E5400> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: guix depends on openldap? To: guix-devel@gnu.org, zimoun , Efraim Flashner From: Julien Lepiller Message-ID: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:5884:8208::1; envelope-from=julien@lepiller.eu; helo=lepiller.eu X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=lepiller.eu header.s=dkim header.b=d47beVI ; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=lepiller.eu (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 2.59 X-TUID: T4T/VHr/8he+ Le 19 novembre 2020 10:33:10 GMT-05:00, zimoun a =C3=A9crit : >Hi, > >On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 15:32, Efraim Flashner >wrote: > >> > > > --8<---------------cut >here---------------start------------->8--- >> > > > $ guix graph -t bag --path guix openldap >> > > > guix@1=2E1=2E0-29=2E4e3ed9b >> > > > guile-ssh@0=2E13=2E1 >> > > > libssh@0=2E9=2E5 >> > > > cmake-minimal@3=2E16=2E5 >> > > > curl@7=2E69=2E1 >> > > > openldap@2=2E4=2E49 >> > > > --8<---------------cut >here---------------end--------------->8--- >> > > > >> > > > Why does curl need an "Implementation of the Lightweight >Directory >> > > > Access Protocol"? >> > > >> > > I think a better question is can cmake-minimal depend on a new >> > > curl-minimal, or does it even need curl at all? >> > >> > Looks like I was wrong, there is a curl-minimal afterall >> > >> > guix size cmake-bootstrap 199=2E1 MiB >> > guix size cmake-minimal >> > with curl-minimal 198=2E7 MiB >> > guix size cmake-minimal 214=2E9 MiB >> >> HOWEVER, anything else that also depends on curl could depend on curl >> and on curl-minimal, which would be worse than what we have now=2E So >I'd >> leave cmake-minimal with curl and remove the extra bits outlined >below=2E > >I am still confused=2E Why cmake-minimal needs all the protocols that >curl supports? What I was expecting is that cmake-minimal depends on >curl-minimal and that both packages are minimal=2E :-) >Because all in all, we end with a chubby Guix; which matters when >packing it (Docker or system)=2E I don't think it matters: no reference is retained from guix to openldap, = so it won't be added to the pack or docker image=2E It's only required at b= uild time=2E > >All the best, >simon