From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Vollmert Subject: Re: Please merge wip-haskell-updates (Re: [bug#36807] remove obsolete broken haskell packages) Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 09:49:32 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87muh2ckdn.fsf@ngyro.com> <21D6742C-75C4-47A0-9F1A-0C911C24E3DA@vllmrt.net> <87mugmq5ll.fsf@ngyro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46103) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1huuEC-0002Ql-IZ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 03:49:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1huuEB-0007v1-MK for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 03:49:52 -0400 Received: from mx2a.mailbox.org ([2001:67c:2050:104:0:2:25:2]:35430 helo=mx2.mailbox.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1huuEB-0007tg-EC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 03:49:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87mugmq5ll.fsf@ngyro.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Timothy Sample Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 36807@debbugs.gnu.org Oh, I meant to ask: On 6. Aug 2019, at 06:29, Timothy Sample wrote: > Robert Vollmert writes: >=20 >> Hi all, Timothy, >=20 > Cool! I=E2=80=99m in the process of looking everything over. In the = meantime, > I have some early questions and comments. >=20 >> I=E2=80=99ve incorporated your comments, and removed >> ghc-packedstring. In addition, the branch incorporates some other >> patchsets: >>=20 >> #36493: updating GHC-included haskell dependencies (this one is = already >> in core-updates) >=20 > I think it makes sense to wait for the core-updates merge (which > shouldn=E2=80=99t be too far out). Why? Shouldn=E2=80=99t substitutes be available since CI built the = branch successfully?