Hi Guix!


Thank you for feedback, I've sent V2 for https://issues.guix.gnu.org/64201

It was built successfully from the latest master branch check out.

Thanks,
Oleg

On Mon, 24 Jul 2023, 18:36 Sharlatan Hellseher, <sharlatanus@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Andreas,
>
> Thank you for your time.
>
> This issue may be closed  https://issues.guix.gnu.org/64287 as Tobias
> applied all of it's patches.
> I'm not sure about the reason of splittingt them into smaller ones, it
> may be a question to him :-)
>
> I'll rebase patches from https://issues.guix.gnu.org/64201 to the
> current master branch and sent V2, hope they are look ok.
>
> Regards,
> Oleg
>
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 at 09:53, Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> wrote:
> >
> > Am Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 10:36:26PM +0200 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> > > You’re now well known so pretty much the only thing I would wait for as
> > > a reviewer before applying these updates is (1) a green light from
> > > qa.guix,
> >
> > This looks like it lags behind now.
> >
> > > and (2) a bit of spare time.
> >
> > Ah, we should not wait for the impossible to happen! ;-)
> >
> > The status of the patches is unclear to me, it looks as if some of them
> > have been rewritten and merged by Tobias (maybe this also confuses QA?
> > do the patches still apply?) But I find it difficult to understand what
> > needs to be done still. For instance, there is a patch "stuff: Update to
> > 1.26.0-0.9008dc0", but it is already at version 2.0.1 in master.
> >
> > How about sending a second version for the remaining patches on top of
> > current master?
> >
> > Andreas
> >
>
>
> --
>
> … наш разум - превосходная объяснительная машина которая способна
> найти смысл почти в чем угодно, истолковать любой феномен, но
> совершенно не в состоянии принять мысль о непредсказуемости.
>