From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julian Graham Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: gzochi: Update to 0.10. Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:11:00 -0400 Message-ID: References: <874m6dsa5l.fsf@netris.org> <87a8g45ae8.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53087) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bcDM0-0005hp-K6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:11:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bcDLy-0006SP-Hm for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:11:03 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-x243.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c09::243]:34309) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bcDLy-0006SE-By for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:11:02 -0400 Received: by mail-qk0-x243.google.com with SMTP id r128so10623405qkc.1 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 08:11:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87a8g45ae8.fsf@netris.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 1:20 AM, Mark H Weaver wrote: > If you have 'guix' installed, you can run: > > guix build --system=i686-linux --keep-failed gzochi > > to reproduce the same build on your machine, and to leave the failed > build directory in /tmp/guix-build-* for further investigation. Neat! I'll give that a shot. > If you can fix the problem on i686, please let me know and I'd be glad > to test the same fix on armhf. > > What do you think? Will do. From a Guix perspective, what's better: A new gzochi release or a patch for Guix to apply against the 0.10 release?