Re: Website, differentiating GuixSD vs Guix

[Amirouche Boubekki <amirouche.boubekki@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1630 bytes --]

2015-05-21 23:43 GMT+02:00 Luis Felipe López Acevedo <
felipe.lopez@openmailbox.org>:

> On 2015-05-20 14:22, Paul van der Walt wrote:
>
>> Hello Guix,
>>
>> Minor headache i had, thought i'd share.
>>
>> Went to the website to download the binary tarball (which seems to work
>> very well, kudos!), but was bitten by the fact that the GuixSD and GNU
>> Guix downloads aren't separated. I first ended up with GuixSD instead of
>> Guix, then after reading way too quickly concluded that i686 was what i
>> wanted, ended up with the wrong Guix for my platform (x86_64, which is
>> visually at the end of the "list" containing GuixSD 0.8.2 (x86_64) and
>> GuixSD 0.8.2 (i686)).
>>
>> So, i realise i should read more carefully and all, but perhaps a
>> horizontal rule between the two GuixSD and the 4 GNU Guix downloads
>> would be nice?
>>
>> Feel free to call me hasty and myopic or just ignore me. Otherwise it
>> looks really polished, congrats :)
>>
>> Ciao,
>> p.
>>
>
> Hey, Paul, thanks for your feedback.
>
> The items in the download page will be updated to look like in the
> following mock-up to make them more compact:
>
>
> https://multimedialib.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/guixsd-downloads-mockup-2015-05-21.png
>
> Hopefully, the new design will also help people


What do you think about using a “laptop logo” or something for GSD instead
of the “package”?


> who push buttons without reading (just kidding :)).
>

Those who don't know the difference between GSD and Guix :)


>
> --
> Luis Felipe López Acevedo
> http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2754 bytes --]